[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] RG11
Does anyone use RG11? I have never used it and is it harder to put
connectors on over RG6? Thanks.
Depends on the type. If it's the copper based version, regular UHF plugs
can be soldered on just as is done with the more common RG-8. The aluminum
based type would use a specific crimp connector which would require the
right tools.
One problem with RG-6 for MW frequency is the loss. The center conductor is
copper coated steel. This has a higher resistive loss as the frequency
drops. RG-6 used for video is solid copper center conductor. This is for
composite video, not VHF or UHF.
Rather than use RG-11 I'd probably buy RG-8 that is suitable for being
buried. Even RG-58 would be OK if it's under 100 feet or so. It can be
bought with connectors already installed. Plug and play.
Another test I made is making a balun for each end and using CAT5 ethernet
network cable. It's balanced and gathers less noise or unwanted signals on
the way in. Also cheap and very easy to build.
Craig Healy
Providence, RI
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx