[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IRCA ---I--78 --45--#4 Re: 930 CJYQ
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IRCA ---I--78 --45--#4 Re: 930 CJYQ
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:17:52 -0500
They are going from directional to non directional at night.. hence the need
to reduce power.. they can't run 25KW Non directional at night and still
protect the other stations. They probably sold the land or lost the lease
and have to move.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:42 PM, bill kral <jwkral@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any indication saying why CJYQ St.John's NF wants to reduce night
> time
> power and change Tx location? Could it be a local reception problem? In any
> case
> that move will result in the loss of a few night time listenrs and produce
> a
> closer drop in of a 50KW 930 in another city with almost the same
> name--Saint
> John NB.That could be a bit confusing for people hearing two signals
> mentioning
> what sounds almost the same.But That's just a hypothesis at this time.Bill
> in BC
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx