Re: [IRCA] RE 1130 interference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] RE 1130 interference



CKWX, as it's a Cdn clear...

----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] RE 1130 interference


Move CKWX or The Mt Angel station to 1570/1580?

Paul


On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Saul DX <sauldx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why not move it to 1570 or 1580?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica" <
irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] RE 1130 interference



 I was informed tonight by a friend that in 1952 CBU moved from 1130 to
690 as the CBC was concerned about exactly what has happened. I guess I
did not realize that 1130 is a Canadian Clear as well as as an American
Clear. 690 on the other hand is a Canadian & Mexican Clear. If 1130 was
a Canadian & Mexican Clear, there would not be the issue, at least with
Daytime interference. I guess Tijuana does QRM CBU at times in some
areas at night. Not here though, CBU is a huge powerhouse 24/7. The
strongest Canadian I get.
 On another list there are Canadian reports that the  Mt. Angel
station is QRMing within 10 miles East of the CKWX tx site in Burnaby
and also off the coast on Vancouver Island near Duncan, so the QRM is
wide spread and easily in the main contour of CKWX's Grade A signal
area.

73,

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx