Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

[Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>]

It is, but my thought was that sunrise/sunset enhancement will still be there even if they used larger towers.


Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Modified Sony ICF 2010 barefoot


--- On Thu, 10/7/10, scott@xxxxxxxxxx <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: scott@xxxxxxxxxx <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 7, 2010, 4:47 PM
> > My read isn't that this is a
> daytime skywave issue but rather a
> > sunrise/sunset issue, although the same solution might
> still help.
> 
> It's the same thing, is it not? The reason CKWX gets
> hammered just after
> sunrise and just before sunset is because the skywave
> hasn't died down
> yet, so those 25 gallons of KPWX come blaring in, whereas
> during the rest
> of the day it's all groundwave and the signal behaves the
> way it's
> "supposed to" on paper.
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
> those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
> reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
> staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 


      
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx