Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-12

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

Hi Mauno,
 
Thanks for listening to the MP3.
 
I switched to the largest antenna here (the 9' PVC box loop) for TP-DXing  
this morning, and received a Japanese station on 729 kHz at a fairly good  
level. Don't know for sure if this is the same station as yesterday, but it's 
 the first time that 729-JOCK (// 594) has been heard here. Bruce may have  
been right.
 
73, Gary  
 
 
In a message dated 9/13/2010 5:29:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
Mauno.Ritola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Sounds Japanese.

73, Mauno

13.9.2010 10:18, D1028Gary@xxxxxxx  kirjoitti:
> Hello All,
>
> For anyone with superior Asian  language identification skills (Korean or
> Japanese) able to listen to  the entire 729 kHz MP3 from the TP-DXing  
session
> this morning  (2.48 MB, just over 2 minutes), it has been uploaded   to
>
>      _http://www.mediafire.com/?d0k54axtour55v5_
>  (http://www.mediafire.com/?d0k54axtour55v5)     .
>
>
> The recording was made through 730-CHMJ splatter  using a modified
> Ultralight radio, and is not exactly high fidelity.  The language of the  
female
> speaker (under the splatter) is  either Korean or Japanese, and informed
> opinions would be  appreciated..
>
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup,  WA)
>
>
> In a message dated 9/12/2010 10:57:12 P.M. Pacific  Daylight Time,
> D1028Gary@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> Hi   Bruce,
>
> Thanks for listening to the 729 kHz MP3. The lady is  speaking  so  
quickly
> that it's tough to be 100% sure of the  language, and even  though my  
first
> inclination was Korean,  there was no Pyongyang BS  parallel to check at 
the
>
> time.  You could be right about possible  Japanese. The 729 kHz clip was
>  only  a
> short portion of the 2-minute  MP3, and I'll review  it again for more
> clues, and send you the whole  clip if you  like.
>
> Last October I had China dominant and a presumed  NK  on this frequency
> during a rare 729 kHz strong signal, and  even  though I've seen many
> reports of
> Japan on 729, it's  never been heard  here. In any case, it's kind of a
> moral
>  victory for me to get either  station here in Puyallup on Ultralights,  
with
> the  CHMJ splatter  blanketing the frequency 99% of the  time here :-)  
I'll
>
> be  happy either  way!
>
> 73, Gary
>
>
> In a message dated   9/12/2010 8:00:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>  bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx  writes:
>
> Gary
>
> I  heard Japan on 729 several times last  season.  Sometimes   China  was
> there too, either mixing  with Japan or by   itself.   They were somewhat
> regular  catches for me,  despite the  splash from CHMJ.
>
> It's hard to tell   for sure, but your short clip  sounds like it could be
>  Japanese  rather than Korean.  She's almost a  bit too melodic  to be 
from
> North Korea.
>
> Bruce
>
> On  9/12/2010  4:22 PM,  D1028Gary@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hello  All,
>>
>> The  Asiatic  conditions were generally  good here this morning, with the
>>   first  reception  of the season for 675-VOV (Vietnam), and a couple of
>  unusual
>> stations on 729 and 1053 kHz. The "big gun" Japanese  and  the  Chinese
> stations
>>    were  down a little in  strength, but North  Korea seemed stronger  
than
>> ever. Like  Dennis, I noticed the unusually  strong  signal on 729 kHz 
and
>
> made a
>> recording through the  730  Vancouver splatter, which  had the typical
>>  Pyongyang BS shouting Korean  YL under the  splatter (ink  below).
> Although that
>> station was  heard  here  once before last October mixing  with China,
> it's
>  rare
>>   for anything to show up on 729 kHz here, and  when   something does,  
it's
>> usually China. The  Chinese stations  generally did not   manage much
>  audio
> this
>> morning, and  stayed in the carrier  category  except for  756-CNR1 and
> 1377.   There
>> was another mystery station  on 1053 kHz under  the   Jammer-- maybe the
> same
>> one Dennis  heard.  An MP3 seemed to  have shouted  Korean (like on  729
> kHz),
>> but  nothing  definite could be made  out. In  summary, it was a pretty
>>     interesting   morning!
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA    mailing   list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>  Opinions   expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of  the
> original   contributors and do not necessarily reflect  the opinion of the
> IRCA,
> its  editors, publishing staff,  or officers
>
> For more  information:   http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message:    irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA   mailing  list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>  Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of  the
> original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the  opinion of the 
IRCA,
> its  editors, publishing staff, or  officers
>
> For more information:   http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message:   irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing  list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx