[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP for 27 Aug from Victoria, BC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP for 27 Aug from Victoria, BC
- From: D1028Gary@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:36:08 EDT
Derek and All,
After having a chance to listen carefully to the 846 kHz ABC station MP3
recorded during the Lincoln City DXpedition, I noted that at 1:02 into the
recording there is indeed an "RN" spoken after the ABC network ID, so this
is apparently the 10 kw 2RN station in Canberra.
This is yet another Aussie that never produced a trace for John B. or me,
during 7 combined ULR DXpeditions to Grayland.
73, Gary
In a message dated 8/27/2010 2:05:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
D1028Gary@xxxxxxx writes:
Hi Derek,
The ABC 846 kHz station was only received on the exceptional morning of
8-20 in Lincoln City, and not at all on the other two days last week (8-21
and
8-22).
During both recent Oregon trips I made a serious effort to check DU's on
909 kHz for your UnID country music, but there was always nasty domestic
splatter from 910 kHz (presumably Vancouver, WA) along the NW Oregon
coast. It
was one of the noisiest split frequencies on the band, unfortunately.
73, Gary
In a message dated 8/27/2010 11:40:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
eargazimm@xxxxxxx writes:
Thanks Gary for the 846 ID. It's one of the few I've been trying to
track down from last year.. Now it's on to the unid 909khz
Thank you.....
Derek Vincent
Vmedia360.......everywhere
On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:29 AM, D1028Gary@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Your 846 kHz Australian station was received at a fairly strong level
> during my ULR DXpedition to Lincoln City, Oregon last week. This
> recording on
> 846 contains an ABC ID, but I didn't check an RN parallel. It was
> the first
> DU I'd ever heard on 846.
>
> _http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i_
> (http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i)
>
> 73, Gary
>
>
> In a message dated 8/27/2010 6:18:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> nhp@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be
> guessed at
> by
> cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or
> music) :
>
> 594 seemed JOAK by direction
> 612 later on, 4QR by direction
> 702 at 1309, DU direction, so 2BL
> 747 later on, JOIB by direction
> 774 JOUB by direction
> 828 JOBB by direction
> 846 DU by direction, woman talking in the murk; 2RN likely; not too
> strong a carrier so well modulated?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA,
its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA,
its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx