Re: [IRCA] TP for 27 Aug from Victoria, BC

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

Hi Derek,
 
The ABC 846 kHz station was only received on the exceptional morning of  
8-20 in Lincoln City, and not at all on the other two days last week (8-21 and 
 8-22).
 
During both recent Oregon trips I made a serious effort to check DU's on  
909 kHz for your UnID country music, but there was always nasty domestic  
splatter from 910 kHz (presumably Vancouver, WA) along the NW Oregon  coast. It 
was one of the noisiest split frequencies on the band,  unfortunately.
 
73, Gary 
 
In a message dated 8/27/2010 11:40:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
eargazimm@xxxxxxx writes:
 
Thanks  Gary for the 846 ID. It's one of the few I've been trying to  
track  down from last year.. Now it's on to the unid 909khz

Thank  you.....

Derek Vincent

Vmedia360.......everywhere

On Aug  27, 2010, at 10:29 AM, D1028Gary@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi  Nick,
>
> Your 846 kHz Australian station was received at a fairly  strong level
> during my ULR DXpedition to Lincoln City, Oregon last  week. This  
> recording on
> 846 contains an ABC ID, but I  didn't check an RN parallel. It was  
> the first
> DU I'd  ever heard on 846.
>
>  _http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i_
>  (http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i)
>
> 73,  Gary
>
>
> In a message dated 8/27/2010 6:18:47 A.M. Pacific  Daylight Time,
> nhp@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Burbles  in  the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be  
> guessed  at
> by
> cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in  talk or  
> music)  :
>
> 594 seemed JOAK by  direction
> 612  later on, 4QR by  direction
> 702   at 1309, DU direction, so 2BL
> 747 later on, JOIB by   direction
> 774 JOUB by direction
> 828 JOBB by direction
>  846  DU by  direction, woman talking in the murk; 2RN likely; not  too
> strong a carrier so  well modulated?
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing  list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the  
>  original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of   
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>  For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a  message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx