[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] FCC Site: The End-All Be-All ??
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] FCC Site: The End-All Be-All ??
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:19:18 -0400
Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
I get your point, but when it comes to what stations are off the air, the
FCC's list is the authority...not Freshwater's.
Well, no.
The FCC's list is the authority as to which stations have voluntarily
reported themselves as silent to the FCC.
The FCC's list is the authority as to which stations are at risk of
having their licenses cancelled a year after reporting themselves as
silent to the FCC.
But the FCC's list is not at all authoritative when it comes to telling
DXers what we actually want to know: which stations are REALLY off the
air, whether or not they've reported it to the FCC.
For that purpose, there is no single authoritative list. The FCC's list
is a good starting point, though some of the stations listed there have
returned to the air without notifying the FCC. Lee's list is a good one.
We try to keep tabs at 100000watts.com on who's really silent, whether
or not it's been reported to the FCC. So does Barry McLarnon, and so do
Wayne and the NRC Log.
Put them all together and add the real-time info you can get from this
and other lists, and you start to get a picture of reality.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx