Re: [IRCA] Low Priority West Coast Question (KCBC-770) - Answered

[Mike Hardester <DX4EVR@xxxxxxxxx>]

    Thank you to those who replied to my inquiry. It makes sense in a 
round-about way. Another West Coast mystery solved. Again, Thanks to 
y'all.    73 de Mike

On 4/13/2010 11:11, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying Scott, I didn't think of a COL hopscotch game being
> the situation here.
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Scott Fybush<scott@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>    
> > Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I could be so way off.. maybe Scott Fybush wil lread this and correct me?
> >      
> > >        
> > He will, and he is :)
> >
> > KCBC's move was actually a side effect of a move on the FM band. The 96.7
> > station that had been licensed to Manteca (KMRQ, if memory serves) figured
> > out that it could significantly improve its signal over Modesto if it moved
> > its transmitter site. But moving its transmitter site meant it would no
> > longer put a city-grade signal over Manteca, so it needed a new city of
> > license. But 96.7 was also the only station licensed to Manteca, so it
> > couldn't move without replacing that "first local service" in Manteca.
> >
> > That's where KCBC came in. With a bit of a power tweak, it could change
> > city of license from Riverbank to Manteca, and Riverbank was a city of
> > license that worked for 96.7's new transmitter site, so the swap was made,
> > KCBC became "Manteca" and 96.7 became "Riverbank."
> >
> >
> > s
> >      


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx