[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Low Priority West Coast Question (KCBC-770)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Low Priority West Coast Question (KCBC-770)
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:15:10 -0500
They increased night power from 1KW to 4100W without changing the number of
antennas. Probably they wouldn't have been able to upgrade and still cover
their City of License the day they needed to at night, as the FCC requires
of a Class B so by changing their city of license, they have less to cover.
That's the only thing I can figure
Paul Walker
www.onairdj.com
www.facebook.com/onairdj
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Mike Hardester <DX4EVR@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just noted the following in the latest SDXM (Vol. 47 #26):
>
>
> 770 KCBC Manteca, CA License to cover 50K/4.1K DA-2 Change city of
> License from Riverbank to Manteca (A)
>
> Mainly just curious as to why the City of License change. Does this
> place the station in a better market? Being born and raised in Modesto, and
> Riverbank just up the road a piece, Modesto and Stockton would seem to be
> the main market for the station. In Manteca, I would think that the Bay Area
> (San Francisco/Oakland) and Stockton (Modesto to a lesser degree) would be
> their market competition.
>
> Enlightenment for this oldster (still younger than Pat Martin and Don
> Kaskey, hi) would be welcome.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx