[IRCA] TP for 30 Oct from Victoria, BC

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

Was up late last night, so didn't get to the radio this morning until 1440UT.    Results not too different from Colin's although without the visual and other effects (breakfast must have contained some interesting side dishes up on the hill this morning, hi)

594 is a bit of a mystery; the non-JOAK signal was also observed here, often on top, though not as strong as JOAK was at peaks.  Gary D. has heard KBS there, but KBS-1 can be hard to parallel.  Neither 711 or 1305 were in this morning, and 756 seemed to be China if it was anything at all.  And, an earlier attempt at finding a webstream ended in failure.

Also did some SDR-14 recording overnight, and threw the files away rather quickly.  Not much useful across the hour at 1000, 1200 or 1300UT this morning.




pretty darn good audio (at least briefly): 


594 JOAK , though often u/unID signal
603 HLSA at 1447 //558, w/mx underneath
774 JOUB at 1449, usually rougher than this level  (!)
972 HLCA


reasonable audio  at  times during the period (though often battling w/splash or noise):

828 JOBB




not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise: 

279 R. Rossii
558 HLQH //603
567 JOIK //594
621 hum and the mystery CC  
936 likely Anhui
1017 likely CRI, not //774
1134 //972 at 1450UT



Burbles in the splatter and noise:

576 (nothing like the strength Colin got)
738 mx
756 seemed //5030, so CNR-1
801 mx at 1456
1566 w/big carrier

Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):

(didn't listen long enough to dig at this level; as is so frequent now, DX could likely have been found by hard work.....)


best wishes,

Nick



*****************************
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx