Re: [IRCA] Antenna question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Antenna question



Hi Joe,
I'm familiar with this article, and with the opamp used. That's an audio-frequency opamp; it only has a few dB gain at 500 kHz; it would have next to nothing in the higher MW range. The lower in frequency you go, the more gain it will have, so it would work better in the NDB band. But any small loop is not very sensitive at LF, especially if used indoors. A much better LF loop is the "Shielded active loop" on VE7SL's webpage http://imagenisp.com/jsm/
73,
Steve
----- Original Message ----- From: <kj8o@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "IRCA" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "NRC" <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:41 AM
Subject: [IRCA] Antenna question


Hello everyone,

During the weekend, I got to hear some of the experimental stations in the
500-515 kHz (600 meter) band. One thing led to another and I soon
encountered a design for a 500 kHz simple loop antenna that had been posted
on the web (see http://www.500kc.com/WA1ZMS/index.htm ).

Now I am curious if any list member has tried this antenna design (or
something similar). Being so close to the bottom edge of the MW Broadcast
band, I'd imagine it would perform quite well there as well. And the non-
directional beacons between 200 and 430 kHz should also be heard quite well.

www.500kc.com is requesting reception reports of stations heard. I'll notify
the group should I receive any QSL cards or letters.



-- 73 de Joe Miller, KJ8O, Troy, MI -- Grid EN82 --
------ WOW! Homepage (http://www.wowway.com) ------


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx