[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] CKPK-600 OR NOT?
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] CKPK-600 OR NOT?
- From: Doug Smith <w9wi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:28:14 -0600
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; domainkeys=hardfail (test mode) header.From=w9wi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=YDcJiWRGXve+G/1FUXi+5Av4Si2vBnAmaDxMQKyu+71LfUwdVGlETbpNdoLM+Pe6; h=Received:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Organization:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Domainkey-status: bad (test mode)
- Organization: Ham Radio W9WI
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:51 -0800, Pete Taylor wrote:
> There is some question in my mind as to whether what is now operating
> on 600 in Vancouver is actually called CKPK (AM). Has anyone actually
> heard them ID as "CKPK AM & FM"? Hs anyone actually seen a call letter
> change request for the remaining 90 days of the station's life? In my
> mind, the AM is still CKBD and it is simply relaying CKPK (FM).
As of Friday it was still CKBD in the I-C database. (while the FM is
indeed CKPK)
Given the poor compliance of Canadian stations to the ID rules I doubt
we're ever going to hear an ID from either station...
>
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx