Re: [IRCA] Barefoot TA's on the West-Coast! A tally

[Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I had absolutely no trace of TA's below 900.  The lowest was a het on 
909, which oddly enough you don't have listed here.  It's amazing the 
difference 100km can make (I suspect you guys have an "unfair" advantage 
having lots of salt water to the east).

The lack of low band stuff might have been just local interference.  It 
doesn't help to have four locals  with 10-50kw between 710 and 880 :-(

OTOH, 1134 and 1215 had some nice audio at times, so I can;t complain 
too loudly.

Bruce in Seattle
R8A/SDR-IQ, K9AY

cafe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Carriers and some multiples on the following frequencies -
> some yielding wispy audio...
>
> 531 (X2), 594, 621, 639,675, 747, 756, 774!, 783, 801, 819,
> 828, 837, 855 (X2), 864, 873, 891, 918, 927, 1017, 1044, 1053(X2)
>
> I have not heard a hornets next of carriers and near audio
> like this in SOME TIME.
>
> Enjoy and good luck!
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx