[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP's for 03-23-08
Not as good here as yesterday morning. The upper frequencies were again
the best, but they couldn't manage the audio they did yesterday. Perhaps
a few words on 1566, but otherwise just strong carriers. Lower channels
were pretty well non-existent. On the other hand, good reception from
Papua New Guinea on 90 metres this morning.
73,
Nigel Pimblett
Dunmore, Alberta (but currently in Lamont, AB)
>
> --
> Good Morning:
> .
> Listened from 1320-1414 ut. Upper channels
> dominated this morning again. Lower channel
> powerhouse station were weak.
>
> 594 Japan, JOAK 1337 weak with Japanese.
>
> 666 Japan, JOBK 1336 weak with man in Japanese
>
> 774 Japan, JOUB 1334 weak with man in Japanese.
>
> 828 Japan, JOUB 1335 weak with man in Japanese.
>
> 1386 Japan, NHK2 1341 weak with man in Japanese.
>
> 1395 Unknown, 1402 just above threshold with music
> Weak at times.
>
> 1467 Japan, NHK2 1353 weak with woman in Japanese.
>
> 1503 Japan, JOUK 1351 weak with man in Japanese
>
> 1566 Republic of Korea, HLAZ weak at 1322 with man in Asian
> language.
> Fair at 1333
>
> 1575 Thailand, 1332 weak with woman in Asian language.
>
> 1593 China, CRN1 1325 weak wih man in Chinese // 5030.
>
> Dennis,
> Salmon Creek, WA
> JRC 545 Ewe NW
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx