Re: [IRCA] IBOC battle begins

["John Cereghin" <jcereghin@xxxxxxxxx>]

Scott,

If I was conspiracy-minded, I would almost think IBOC was a plot
hatched to thin the herd and kill off the "underperformers" of these
stations you mentioned.  Next up- black helicopters and listening to
Coast-to-Coast all night!  ;)

But it does make you wonder, and I say that as a hobbyist and not as
an "industry insider".

---John

On 11/5/07, Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John Cereghin wrote:
> > On 11/5/07, Craig Healy <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> If the FCC and the courts refuse to intervene, and Congress
> >> likewise sidesteps it, I think we'll see a number of stations
> >> simply fold.  I was speaking to a fellow who does a lot of IBOC
> >> work.  One comment he made was that there are a lot of stations
> >> "that shouldn't be on the air".  Maybe so, but it's not iBiquity's
> >> job to silence them.<<<
> >
> > Man, if that isn't an arrogant attitude on the part of the IBOC boys,
> >  then I don't know what is.  The Industry could get into a huge,
> > drawn out discussion about who "deserves" to be on the air and who
> > doesn't and who really is "serving" their community and who isn't.
>
> There's another way to look at this - it's the free market taking its
> course. If 24-hour IBOC service is valuable enough to the owners of WBZ,
> let's say, to justify paying WYSL's price for silence, then why
> shouldn't those two parties be able to freely set a price and make their
> transaction?
>
> This is nothing really new - look at the AM signals that were bought out
> and taken off the air so WWRL 1600 New York could upgrade a decade or so
> ago, for instance. Or look at WOWO/WLIB.
>
> For every WSNJ, which is indeed a great local station, there are
> probably a dozen AMs just barely limping along with minimal
> listenership, whose owners might welcome a chance to cash out and to
> clean up some of the interference on the dial in the process.
>
> Of course, this would only "solve" one piece of the AM IBOC issue, and
> not even the most critical one. It does nothing to fix the bashing that
> the big clears inflict on one another - Citadel's not going to pay
> itself to take WJR silent at night to allow WABC to run digital, or vice
> versa. And it can't fix the international treaty issues - WBZ might be
> able to buy off WYSL, but it can't do that for CJMS.
>
> s
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>


-- 
http://www.pilgrimway.org/dx.html
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx