Re: [IRCA] WBAL and IBOC hiss from WTAM

["Craig Healy" <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Remember I am within WBAL's NIF contour, and should not be hearing
> > IBOC hiss from WTAM at all.
>
> Yes, but you are also within 600 miles of WTAM which complicates
> matters.

WTAM should not be protected on 1090 or on 1110.  Only 1100.  WBAL should
take precedence on 1090.  A night analog station of that power would never
be allowed on 1090 that close to WBAL, especially non-directional.  That
violates many past and present FCC allocations rules.  That is one of the
rules conflicts totally ignored by this whole matter.

Craig Healy
Providence, RI

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx