[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Shorter BOGs
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Shorter BOGs
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:56:15 -0500
I wasn't terribly impressed with the patterns of a 1080 ft BOG that snaked,
but didn't bend severely up my driveway and to the NE edge of my bluff in
Grafton WI. It seemed OK on the lower band, but high end was quite lossy and
I didn't care for the receiving patterns and even mid band patterns didn't
seem so good, ie mediocre side nulls, wider beam than expected etc. Even as
one gets close to 900 ft, I have not been terribly impressed with the high
end of BCB. However, 893 ft in Grafton gets CFRB = to WSPT daytimes at noon
last August with no termination due to very nice F/B.
Perhaps it is my conductive midwestern ground, but unless interested in only
the lower end or LW, I wouldn't go past 1000 ft for a BOG directly on the
ground as mine are..ie across driveway or well cut lawn.
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Healy" <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Shorter BOGs
>> If my memory serves, didn't Kaz report that BOGs of 1000' offer
>> diminishing returns on the MW band because of ground losses?
>
> Yes, though still useable. Everything has some point of diminishing
> returns. I have a roughly 950' roll of #14 I use occasionally. It seems
> to
> have more than adequate signal and can be phased against a shorter wire
> run
> parallel a few feet away. I have a 450' roll of the same stuff I use for
> that. If those wires could be set out in a smaller land area, it would be
> a
> boon!
>
> I really need a big ol' box of "round tuits". That zigzag test has been
> on
> my list for a long time. I'll try to get that done before the ground
> freezes and the snow flies. I think it would be useful, if it worked.
>
> Now, apply that concept to flag antennas. Wouldn't it be nice if a
> 20'x100'x20' flag could be compressed to a quarter of that size?
> Especially
> if the pattern were intact and the only change was an overall signal drop.
> Heck, a flag that size could be turned by a rotor. I tried a *very* small
> flag antenna made by winding 100' of wire on two horizontal pieces of PVC
> pipe, and two 20' lengths on the two verticals. It sorta worked, but not
> all that well.
>
> Craig Healy
> Providence, RI
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx