[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [!! SPAM] IBOC Revisited
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [!! SPAM] IBOC Revisited
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
--- Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> I think with the increased hash, you will find a lot of stations
> leaving
> their day power/pattern on 24/7. That may be the easiest way to
> combat
> the interference. I kind of doubt the FCC will do much as they have
> created this mess. Can you blame a guy for trying to make a living?
>
>
If a complaint of interference is lodged against a station running day
facilities at night to combat hash, I don't see the FCC buying that as
an excuse. They have made hash interference legal, but the other
remains illegal. The real bottom line is how many such complaints would
be lodged in the first place.
Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
____________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx