Re: [IRCA] (correction) NE Oregon TPs, Monday, LWBC Mongolia

["Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>]

Mongolia was heard on 209, not 207 as stated twice, (but given correctly at 
the start).
Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 6:50 AM
Subject: [IRCA] NE Oregon TPs, Monday, LWBC Mongolia


> Russian LWBC very good this morning, with the addition of Mongolia on both
> 164 and 209. 164 poor/weak with interval signal and theme song at 1200 
> utc;
> 207 with weak talk at 1207 utc. Later, 207 gone but 164 even better at 
> 1239
> utc with weak talk.
> 279, 234, 189, 180, 153 doing very well, with the addition of 171 at 1238
> utc, all playing jazz.
> 828 at medium level, Japan, with English lessons, talking about the Wright
> brothers, and Neil Armstrong at 1219 utc. 1566 HLAZ brief fadeups to weak
> level, with choir singing hymn, "What a Friend we have in Jesus", 1231 
> utc.
> 639 with poor talk, can't get language, 1247 utc. 774 with Japan dominant 
> at
> 1250 utc, with DU talk underneath. At the end, 1116, not 4BC, playing pop
> music with male vocal at 1335 utc, weak level.
> 1737 KUT, PNG beacon weak at 1224 utc.
>
> Steve
> NE Oregon
> R75, 1600' E/W longwire
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx