Re: [IRCA] IBAC vs IBOC

[Milspec390@xxxxxxx]

1. First Ammendment protects unpopular speech, in particular.
 
2. During the 90s, iBLOC's seminal era, connivers adopted the 'Victim' model.
    Victims whine that others - usually knowledgeable parties who've 
discovered their
    chicanery - are picking on them. They relentlessly play the Victim Angle 
to gain
    their ends. Anything less than gushing praise is considered 'hate 
speech', of which
    they are the Victim. Boo hoo.
    
3. TeamBLOC's language is larded with Victim Speech, as well as other 90s 
ploys.
    It's right in front of us.
 
 
4. Who cares what they think? As one writer - not the undersigned - stated, 
re TeamBLOC:

'You post to mislead'.
 
 
    The IBACabal served notice of hostile intent upon citizens and competing 
broadcasters
    by jamming spectrum, denying same, and calling it progress. They are what 
they are.
 
    If they don't like the opprobrium rightly heaped upon them, let them stop 
jamming.
 
   I can't think of a single person who would oppose iBLOC, were the jamming 
to stop.
 
 
   DX'ers are like anyone else. We welcome progress. Destruction is not 
progress.
 
   As one writer - not the undersigned - stated: iBLOC is like a steam 
powered car - 
 
   which scalds everyone and everything around it.'
 
                                                                              
      z



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx