[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 388 question
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 388 question
- From: "Bob Young" <youngbob53@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:34:52 -0500
Woops sorry, sent to the wrong place,
Bob Young
Millbury, Ma
KB1OKL
>From: "Bob Young" <youngbob53@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [IRCA] 388 question
>Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:25:19 -0500
>
>
>Hi Z,
>
>I have a question for you:
>I finally got a 388 and it is everything you've said they would be, I love
>it. My question is when in the crystal position it seems to oscillate for a
>second when the two knobs are tapped and the center frequency will sometime
>move about 1 khz from position to position, ex. from 200 cycles then to a
>wider postition I will have to retune, this is with the BFO on or off. I'm
>positve it's not a tube, it is coming from somewhere in the crystal
>selectivity box (or whatever you call it) Does this most likely seem like
>bad contacts on the selectivity switch itself, or probably a bad connection
>somewhere inside of it? I also get this same thing with an HRO-60 I have
>but
>not anywhere enar as bad. Could the crystal itself just being old do this?
>Any ideas would be appreciated.
>It's 18 degrees here today at 1:23 pm, heatwave time. 1 degree last night,
>lovely weather,
>
>bob
>
> >From: Milspec390@xxxxxxx
> >Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
> >America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] FW: HD radios in a store near you
> >Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:02:10 EST
> >
> >Bob & IRCA auteurs -
> >
> >Misleading. Fine word. Aptly describes every syllable pouring like
> >untreated
> >dysentery ward wastewater from HD Cotillion's big fat gubs.
> >
> >Non-DXer civilians increasingly post that everything re HD is a lie.
> >
> >Understandably so. Failed obsolete concept poorly executed, promoted sub
> >rosa
> >by undue influence and publicly by overblown fanciful tales promising
>'new
> >golden age of radio'.
> >
> >Public disinterest becomes public disappointment upon purchase of HD
> >receiver
> >
> >Isn't this the wretched 90s model yet again?
> >
> >Never admit a mistake. Lie. Deny. Shift blame. Tell more lies. Threaten.
> >
> >All the hallmarks of Three Card Monte artistes. How else can they defend
> >this
> >ruinous plague other than by lying?
> >
> >Every pro-HD argument is either long invalidated or easily so done by six
> >year old slo-wits.
> >
> >Streams? What streams? The same record over and over? Spare us.
> >
> >Impervious to noise? Which? The awful noise it creates or the fact it's
>far
> >more easily disrupted by ordinary interference than is analog?
> >
> >Two-hundred million dollar ad campaign? But it's in 'equivalent' money.
> >
> >Right. Tried paying your property taxes in that peculiar currency? Who
>they
> >kidding?
> >
> >CD Quality audio? Points off for misspelling - 'seedy quality', as one
> >engineer calls it.
> >
> >Oh, well, who cares? Time to hack weeds & brush, sun's out. Plenty Cubano
> >stations to be savored on SR-III's superb AM audio inna warm sun,
>wielding
> >chainsaw, it must be -
> >
> > Leatherface Wednesday.
> >
> > as ever,
> >
> > z
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ><BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers
>free
> >email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
> >http://www.aol.com.
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx