Re: [IRCA] Power vs tower
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Power vs tower



KFYR, in 1981, claimed to have "The largest daylight coverage area of 
any station in the United States" on its QSL card.  
http://qsl.philcobill.com/mw/usa/KFYR_Bismarck_550a.jpg

If that is true, then the coverage area of CBK 540 must be HUGE. I 
remember hearing them regularly in Spokane in the daytime even in the 
summer, and I believe that Pat Martin hears them regularly in Oregon. 
I also understand that they have been heard in the daytime in 
Oklahoma (John Bryant?).

Bill Harms 

On 4 Feb 2007 at 22:08, Craig Healy wrote:

> > Is it true that lower freq daytime signals travel
> > further than higher ones since stations on the lower
> > end seem to come in stronger than ones at the top with
> > the same power from the same location,(disrgarding
> > signal direction),because the wave length is longer on
> > the lower freqs? Also I thought that stations on lower
> > channels used higher towers,while shorter towers were
> > used by stations radiating shorter waves,but I see
> > that does not always apply in every case. Bill in Vic.
> 
> It is a matter of ground conductivity.  The US FCC ground conductivity
> charts show this in clear detail.  I saw a breakout once that a 250w station
> on 540 covers about as well as a 50kw station at 1600.  In practice, it is
> very noticeable.
> 
> For example, one of my clients is WDDZ-550 in Providence.  At 1kw
> non-directional, they are good for about a 50 or more mile radius.  Another
> client is WXBR-1460 which is 5kw non-directional.  WDDZ-550 covers
> significantly better.
> 
> I have that chart somewhere, but doubt I can lay my hands on it any time
> soon.  If I do, I'll post it.
> 
> Craig Healy
> Providence, RI
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx