[IRCA] Dump AM IBOC, Move the AM Band

["Tim Kridel" <tkridel@xxxxxxxxx>]

http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.417.html
 
 
Commentary: Dump AM IBOC, Move the AM Band 	
	
	
by Fred Lundgren, 10.11.2006 		
Fred Lundgren is the CEO of KCAA Radio, licensed to Loma Linda, Calif., in
the Riverside/San Bernardino market.
	

AM and FM radio stations are required to operate in the "public interest,
convenience and necessity" regardless of band, dial position, wattage or
coverage area. Class D AM radio stations can't serve the public convenience
when they receive destructive interference, or when they must reduce power
or sign-off completely in the middle of afternoon drive.

Adopting Ibiquity's AM IBOC as the new AM "standard" is just plain stupid.
And, as talk radio callers remind us, you can't fix stupid. 

Why adopt a standard that causes destructive interference to your station
and all your neighboring stations and, a standard that can't function at
night due to skywave? 

When I add AM IBOC to the previous list of so-called improvements to the AM
band, I get paranoid. Please review my "Top 10 list" and you decide.

1. Adopting wrong AM stereo standard 


2. Break up of the big AM clears 


3. Reductions to AM frequency response 


4. Reductions to AM receiver standards 


5. 125 percent positive peak modulation (This rule does not apply to large
group-owned stations that modulate at 140 percent or higher).

6. Changes to first- and second-adjacency AM rules 


7. Adding expanded-band AM on the wrong end of the dial 


8. Adopting the wrong AM digital standard 


9. Further reduction in AM frequency response 


10. EAS, which allows your local FM rock station to broadcast its call sign
and jingle over your weekly test 


Now, for the full effect, combine all of the above with more new stations
allocated by the AM auction process, a system that equates merit with the
amount of dollars you can raise.

Well, enough already. It is time to level the playing field by migrating all
AM radio stations to a new expanded FM band at frequencies between 54 MHz
and 87.9 MHz. 

Currently, only five VHF television channels (2 through 6) occupy 90 percent
of this spectrum space. Under current FCC rules, some TV stations will
remain on these low frequencies and others will migrate to high-band VHF or
UHF frequencies. 

In my opinion, the FCC should require all TV stations on Channels 2 through
6 to migrate away from lowband VHF. This will benefit all three services,
AM, FM and TV. 

Benefits 


First, it will eliminate the "impulse noise" associated with operating a
digital TV service on a low-band VHF channel. 

Second, it will open up enough FM spectrum to accommodate all existing AM
stations while providing new spectrum space for thousands of future FM
stations. 

Third, it will forever eliminate the destructive interference and
low-frequency response that plagues AM radio.

Fourth, it will remove pressure from the current FM band, which is limited
to only 20 MHz of crowded spectrum.

Each migrating AM should receive an FM frequency allocation consistent with
the rules and mileage separation requirements governing the FM table of
allotments. Further adjustments should be made to acknowledge each station's
previous AM class and coverage area with a goal of restoring each station to
its previous relative status in the community, except all stations will be
licensed as non-directional full-time facilities at a power level determined
by mileage separation. 

No auctions for migrating AMs, please. The FCC already awards enough
spectrum space to broadcasters with the deepest pockets.

Certainly, in the short term, the FCC should listen to the NAB and the
comments in favor of using FM translators on AM stations. However, FM
translators won't help AMs in a crowded FM market unless translators are
protected. Fat chance. Have you seen the backlog of translator applications
already on file? I suspect this translator idea originated with NAB's
membership committee or some public relations group. 

If the NAB takes its own proposal seriously, they must ask the FCC for
protected translators. That requires giving priority to AMs on a needs
basis. Anything less just adds interference to the FM band and does nothing
to fix AM.

If the FCC were to prioritize FM translators for use on the AM band, the
first grants should go to Class D, AM daytime stations that currently
broadcast on Mexican and Canadian clear channels, and within that category,
priority should be given to those stations receiving destructive
interference from illegal stations across the border. Again, no auctions,
please.

Realistically, all of the above is little more than wishful thinking on my
part. In the long run, our success as AM broadcasters will not be determined
by our band, our dial position or even our terrestrial coverage. Instead, we
will be rewarded by quality content as broadband wireless Internet quietly
levels the playing field.


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx