Re: [IRCA] JOUB Question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] JOUB Question



Generally, the Japanese stations are technically on a par with or 
superior to stations in Western Europe and North America.  I heard 
JOUB well this morning and did not notice any abnormalities.

John Bryant
Orcas Island, WA







At 08:46 AM 9/20/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi all, this morning, I did hear j o u b in Akita again, but either the
>4 kilohertz whistle, or their audio has come in for some time now, but
>this morning, it was as though there was extra carrier on that
>frequency, as though the station was modulating rather low, and I
>wonder if these Asian stations experience variance in modulation at
>all, because to me, the carrier was coming in better today than it did
>last week, so I should have heard the audio better.
>On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:08:24 -0700, Walter Salmaniw wrote:
>
>Started monitoring from 13:05 UTC to 14:00.  Initially a pretty
>miserable morning with hardly any audios at anything more than
>threshold.  But, at 13:30, things really picked up.  CRI Russian on 963
>was very nicely heard....one of the nicest signals I've ever heard from
>them here.  My most interesting frequency was 846 which seemed in
>English.  I'm pretty sure I heard an ID for Radio National at 13:58,
>but as luck would have it things faded down just before 14:00.  I'm
>assuming this is the Radio National transmitter in Australia.  612 4QR
>was audible weakly.  HLAZ 1566 was only poorly heard, whereas 1575 was
>better (a 7).  Also of interest was 1305 which was possibly in Russian
>at 13:50....that would be Mayak.  A total of 29 audios, but most of
>these threshold only (a 6/10).  In hindsight, should have slept in
>until 13:30 and then monitored! .......Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date:
>9/19/2006
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Marty
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx