[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Quantum Phaser saga
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Quantum Phaser saga
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:52:30 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=EQ7QAoSHIZK8HNTpebFhmd5qiYo7Q3MzDWjkuPES8j4ikxRBGgiY0ZJmLJlhkQZD; h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
My experience is that S9+50 is too much for R8A's. Maybe you can handle one
of them but several lead to trouble. This is one reason I use my
considerably lower signal BOG's than elevated mini Beverages. Considerably
greater directivity is the main reason, however.
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:45 PM
Subject: [IRCA] Quantum Phaser saga
> Greeting all,
>
> I soldered the .1 cap onto the board this evening and the loss is now
> gone. Infact the unit is a bit too hot for even my rural area, Instead
> of KSWB being S9+40 DB without the phaser, I am closer to S9+50 DB. The
> input the Eastern beverage in connected to, that control, I get a couple
> slight biddies with the control more than 2/3 open. But the loss in gone
> and it sure makes a difference. I would rather have it this way than
> with the loss. However Gerry suggested I try .01 to .1 and I bought a
> .047 too. I think I will put that in. What I want is no loss, but I
> don't need the extra gain either. More to follow.
>
> 73,
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Martin
> Home of the 2006 IRCA Convention
> Seaside Oregon!
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx