[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.
- From: Ira Elbert New III <ien3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:35:17 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: hard-core-dx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;hard-core-dx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=rwBljja1EQl/H+eumvjjl+qJxHO0z3fd3VLw4hys/kw=; b=EZ7W7h+kQh3JjaAPVMk7r/vQSOFIIbw/F9jBZFqpFKVAAks26wVeMnNuNiRP81Lgif/lo+Qhi03ZaLHb1RHSkXWgU4YC1a843RQPr1NBbps/xaQSPZXr+o8zKGYfFIEoGEFadoHPBHEPJ7aFMc9zGhveJsCKixY2A9beS48dAKFGmSmheDAFytGmlRm1fiQMovSrMsLILnPgRfVfTQteZcPYoFVXTRcJZ4hC/tRi4AaFj+3uGaHcbWXt4BQJ4A+ZWY38wVDJJQ1AHYl482Y72MOP7ATfS5p+LmRpl3k37blIEvgTAsLblfucwm+4URCM4o6AaTAS8egKpd/oOXuGSg==
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
- Thread-index: AQHStj0TaR8kse4pukmCMvhkDrQneKHHDt8AgAAGhRo=
- Thread-topic: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.
How much is it going for?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 15, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
> broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)
>
> They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make this
> a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
> signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
> market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.
>
> Paul
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
>>
>> I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
>> understand, I thought I would ask.
>>
>> When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
>> confused.
>>
>>>>> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
>> the business side of radio.
>>
>> A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
>>
>> Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
>> radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
>> thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do you
>> want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vince
>> Ottawa, ON
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx