Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

[Todd S <amdxing1976@xxxxxxxxx>]

Food for thought, what about no brainer consistent hets from 891 and 1521
in the Midwest?


Todd Skaine
Bloomington Mn

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:40 AM Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA <
irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Stan-
>
> I agree with Jim 100%.  Detecting a carrier is not enough information for
> a logging.  You need to hear audio.  Hearing and recording a local ID is
> preferable but not 100% necessary.  If you hear audio on a particular
> frequency and find a shortwave parallel or webstream of the same station
> with the same audio, that is sufficient to claim a logging.
>
>
>
>
> Marc DeLorenzo
> South Dennis, Cape Cod, Massachusetts
> MW DXer since 1962 - 105 countries heard on MW
>  http://forums.wtfda.org/showthread.php?228-DeLorenzo-s-Classic-DX
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Renfrew <jim.renfrew@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 9:04 am
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
>
> A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have
> previously logged it with IDable material I may presume that it's what I've
> previously heard.  So that's not claiming a new station, just reporting on
> reception conditions.  You could argue that a distinct known offset, like
> 774.005, might be enough to determine the source of a carrier, but I
> wouldn't (even if I could measure that precisely).  Also, offsets can
> change, sometimes on a daily basis. But some have had big offsets like
> Libya 1053 and Albania 1395 and it's pretty clear what those signals might
> be, but, again, I wouldn't report them as new loggings unless there was
> something IDable.  Libya, for example, was heard around 2010 on a big
> offset, but it was only when I heard its Big Ben-style bells that I logged
> it.  Jim Renfrew, Holley NY
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Stan Horzepa <stanzepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > I have been chasing DX for almost 50 years.
> >
> > In ham radio, when I exchange signal reports with a DX station, I enter
> > the station in the log.
> >
> > With one-way DX'ing (LW, MW, FM, TV, etc.), when I hear (or see) the call
> > sign of the DX station, I enter the station in the log.
> >
> > But what about all those LW and MW carriers I see reported here on almost
> > a daily basis. Do you log them as new stations even though you can not
> > positively identify them?
> >
> > For example, last week I heard carriers on 549, 684, 693, 855 and 1215,
> > but there was no discernible audio to help identify those stations. 1215
> > was probably Absolute Radio, but do I log it as a new station?
> >
> > What is the general philosophy about logging carriers?
> >
> > FWIW, I have not logged them as new stations. Am I being too
> conservative?
> >
> > Stan, WA1LOU
> > Wolcott, CT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Marc DeLorenzo <midcapemarc@xxxxxxx>
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:40:31 -0400
> Subject: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx