Re: [IRCA] LW BC 2/17/17

[Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx>]

189 is excellent here at 0603 ut.
162, 171 and 198 have solid carriers.
DCF39 on 138.830 has data bursts very visible.
Even the time signal on 77.5 has a solid carrier.
Seems like a pretty decent longwave night.
Yet 1215 is just a tiny trace.
On the western beverage, 1017 and 1098 show a solid carrier (now 0612ut)

Don
Lamont, Alberta

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> OK, Richard.  I'm envious of your location.  No hope for me in my urban
> location on LW with the level of noise.  Understand now!  73, Walt
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 21:50 Richard N Allen <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Walter:
> >
> > I didn't say I was hearing 162 kHz.  The signal is displayed by the G313e
> > software on my computer.  The signal can be heard when I set the receiver
> > to 500 Hz CW.  The station has been used for standard frequency purposes
> > since the late 1970s, originally broadcasting on 163.8 kHz.  It now
> carries
> > an atomic clock controlled time signal inaudible on an AM receiver.  From
> > what I've read it's still using a power of 2 MW and has a range of
> > approximately 3500 km or 2175 miles.
> >
> > Morocco now has a fair signal on 171 kHz at 0545.
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 2017, at 22:58, Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > But what was Richard hearing?  I remember hearing a mixing product on
> the
> > > same frequency as Allouis.  I understood that he time signals are
> > > unmodulated.  Walt
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx