[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-20
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-20
- From: d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:32:14 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1474410854; bh=AQM2ZsmvxUw58wiW6L/LXMzd/lUJOq3MunEGBPqYxjA=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=YhYnZrJhh3YP82lKMOKWO6aKXVr0tMP3sxj3yXHeRtCD47mBRJTNyYSu6s4aRVd2P 2z6rrWQqUTfKFBFTfvarIwrbB9xFLh/R3BN3oXh4+MmDV8g420OMJ9dY0MRi3UhLaQ WZogNBddJwJVxB5SJ1qKdGZjYFjim96jyEWCqAges1/xK/EAOHRypEp3PKCZPHBZUj 4KWzmxpWAVKObAVgblLujL8R7+2jlCJdesFK3yLYWBNwjEaHeRRlJjIhl6aIFfFLfo brSlng5zUdZOWUdPIrUqZi/Btr4RizUDnZ1Dpqc/6IwWOeBOzcUF+QFsaxanu7lGD4 4I9Xr83IJrG9Q==
- Thread-index: 9wo/y387e0ggQAzUXS7nD45t7BpBQg==
- Thread-topic: Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-20
Hi Colin,
<<< I encourage Gary to have a look at my crystal clear audio and video of HLAZ
- I made numerous passes and each time and heard nothing unusual - >>>
I've listened to your HLAZ audio as requested, Colin. Did you have any audio or carrier from 1593-CNR1 at the time? As mentioned previously, unless you have at least some propagation from east China on the high band you are very unlikely to hear any signal from the presumed jammer, no matter how strong of a signal you have from 1566-HLAZ.
During both mornings here there was a moderate carrier on 1593 at the same time as the 1566 jammer's signal was noted, and without any 1593 carrier you probably won't hear any jammer signal. Its propagation the to west coast follows east China patterns, which are much less favorable than 1566-HLAZ's propagation (especially when it beams to the east, during the Japanese service program). On both yesterday and this morning 1593-CNR1's carrier fizzled out after 1300 here, making the jammer also inaudible thereafter (although 1566-HLAZ was pretty strong by itself, as in your recording).
73, Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Colin Newell" <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:26:50 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-20
I encourage Gary to have a look at my crystal clear audio and video of HLAZ
- I made numerous passes and each time and heard nothing unusual -
You must have a pipe line to North Korea - my 657 was buried in muck the
entire time - and I was not there but up-band for that generous and giving
sun rise book that, I swear,
warmed up the shack!
https://youtu.be/mN38jCDqChQ
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:16 AM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Asian propagation favored several less common Asians this morning, with
> another generous sunrise enhancement bringing audio from 603-HLSA (fair),
> 657-Pyongyang (disturbingly strong), 738-BEL2 (fair), 1017 (poor to fair),
> 1035 (poor) and 1044-CRI (poor to fair). Like yesterday the high band
> Asians dropped off significantly after 1300, but the 1566 pulse-type jammer
> was still on HLAZ's signal, occasionally at stronger levels than the
> Japanese Christian service.
>
> Regarding the 1566 pulse-type jammer, it was strongest around 1255 here
> (although my MP3 recorder's batteries chose to go out right then). The
> jammer has a pulsing tone of approximately 700 Hz every two seconds, and I
> was able to confirm that its signal drops off completely on 1565 or 1567
> (i.e., it isn't splatter or electrical noise). In addition, its propagation
> follows TP-DX fading patterns, and it fades in and out at slightly
> different times than HLAZ (although it generally follows HLAZ's trend, as
> far as major changes). Probably the most important factor that I've noticed
> is that it never shows up unless there is at least a moderate carrier from
> 1593-CNR1 in east China, so if you don't have the 1593 carrier at all, you
> probably won't have the 1566 jammer at all (even if you have a good signal
> from HLAZ).
>
> Probably the highlight of this morning's session (if you can call it that)
> was a hair-raising ID from 657-Pyongyang after the strong 3 + 1 pips at
> 1330 (since North Korean time starts on the half hour, this is their
> "TOH."). The tirade lady's hyperactive shouting was one for the record
> books. Sunrise enhancement also brought up 738-BEL2 and the Chinese
> mid-band stations on 1017, 1035 and 1044, although none of these could
> match 657-Pyongyang's irritating signal. The Japanese and Korean big guns
> on 594, 693, 747, 828 and 972 weren't as strong as usual this morning, with
> the exception of the 1053-Jammer, which had an apparent Chinese co-channel
> under it whenever it wasn't at an overpowering level.(as it was most of the
> time, during sunrise enhancement). Overall the session was pretty
> interesting, with 657-Pyongyang's signal the strongest that it's managed
> here for several years.
>
> 657 Pyongyang BS Pyongyang, N.Korea Strong 3 + 1 pips and hair-raising ID
> by the Korean tirade woman at 1330-- the wackiest TOH ID I've ever heard
> https://app.box.com/s/rbhzlzbhgwooghga4w7yzhhktuszj4jn
>
> 738 BEL2 Penghu, Taiwan Chinese pop music with the usual female announcer
> at fair level at 1324
> https://app.box.com/s/ig6zm35tf0oomt27mxo26ajbkospmofl
>
>
>
--
Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
<http://www.Coffeecrew.com> and DXer.ca <http://www.DXer.ca> -
VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx