Re: [Swprograms] Does the BBC World Service fail Britain?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Swprograms] Does the BBC World Service fail Britain?



Mike:

Points well taken; but regardless of what might have been broadcast when, there always would be a debate over whether those broadcasts displayed "the real Britain" (whatever that is!).  At bottom, that's true of any broadcast and that debate won't be settled here.

Obviously, you feel that the "all news all the time" approach of the WS today (yes, overstated somewhat for effect) is preferable to the more "fulsome" WS of the past--whatever its flaws.  Living in the States as I do, I find the new approach certainly helpful and informative to a point; but also repetitious, dull and somewhat antiseptic.  To me, in sum, it's less than it once was.  (I also don't like the more "commercial" sound or style employed today; but that's another matter.)

I realize I use radio differently than many people and that I have my own ideas about what a *good* radio service should be.  But I am entitled to my likes and dislikes--and my opinions--as much as you or anyone else.  :-))

John

P.S.:  With wifi radio now, whenever I want a flavo(u)r of that "old time religion", I tune into Radio 4 or Radio 7 for my fix.


---- Mike Barraclough <softbulletin1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> >--- On Tue, 5/8/08, Sandy Finlayson <sfinlayson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > At that point the vast majority of International
> > Broadcasters were
> > targeting their audiences with information on their
> > countries so that
> > people living abroad could get a sense of the country and I
> > suspect they
> > also were targeting expats who wanted news of home.
> > 
> 
> A great deal of the BBC budget was directed at countries behind the Iron Curtain and other countries where there was not freedom of information, it always has been.
> 
> The impression of Britain you were getting from the BBC World Service was, in my view, essentially that of the middle class establishment, as an article in Time Out in 1973 says quoted in Julian Hales Radio Power:
> 
> "In one week in October 1973 the BBC thought it worthwhile to issue scripts on 'The Centenary of Landseer', 'Horse Brasses', the 'Stately Homes Boom', 'Memorial Gala for John Cranko', reviews of several art exhibitions and 'The Cecils of Hatfield House', rail strikes are met by the British public with 'good humour', bombings with 'calm'; even the Middle East conflict will end 'soon'. Everything has a happy ending.
> 
> 'Left-wing' staff members with 'disruptive sentiments', the article claims, are cajoled into conforming with the accepted ethos, and even end by accepting it as the truth. They find themselves, like the others, giving 'full credit to the Prime Minister', missing 'no opportunity to glorify Britain and make the most of every 'British achievement'; they will say that militants are "hotheads", revolutionaries are "self styled" and use phrases like 'what the Chile junta is up to' making it sound like a group of 'mischievous children'."
> 
> Source Terry Baxter "The Best of All Possible Worlds Time Out 25-31 January 1974.
> 
> As with all polemics there will be some selective quoting and overstatement of the case but I would agree with Hale's conclusion:
> 
> "As far as feature programmes are concerned this makes the BBC External Services no better and no worse than the British Tourist Authority, with its thatched cottages, or Radio 4, with the Archers."
> 
> Is that the impression of Britain you wished to hear and did you think it was wholly accurate?
> 
> Times have moved on and I don't believe BBC World Service programmes would or do reflect those attitudes now, nor should they. In fact the establishment, and the BBC, is now viewed as generally more liberal than the population. But there's always a danger of viewing the past through rose-tinted glasses.
> 
> Hale goes on to say that the really big guns, and he is talking about the English service, are the news and current affairs programmes, they always have been.
> 
> Mr. Durrant's letter is based on some false premises which he states as fact, I can't find the phrase "Britain's voice around the world" on the BBC World Service website for example, and the dramatic headline may well be the work of the Telegraph editorial staff. 
> 
> The world has moved on, mention of the mother country and the Commonwealth makes me wonder if Mr. Durrant has. When he says British plays, British music, British literature is he referring to contemporary British culture which is a lot different to what it was in the past?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       __________________________________________________________
> Not happy with your email address?.
> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
> 
> To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.
> 

_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.