Re: [Swprograms] BBC World in USA

["Scott Royall" <royall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, maybe my high school education in Baton Rouge was unique. It
apparently was, according to your opinion. One of the courses I took was
something called "Media Comprehension," taught by a feisty little old
English teacher. The course covered a spectrum of topics from the six
strategies behind all advertising to decoding and filtering all news
sources. The last thing Mrs. Gulick wanted was for us to depend on
government-sponsored news. This was in the mid-70's, and the teacher had me
busy recording SWBC news shows for class playback so she could drive home
the point of how news is slanted. Sure, Radios Moscow and Havana were
obvious, but then we showed the class how the BBC, Radios Canada and
Australia and VOA slant. Every entity slants, it's the nature of things.

I prefer my news be privately funded because the bias is known and can be
filtered. Publicly-funded news has the problem that it reflects the
interests of sponsors who could change every few years. That means the bias
can shift without my knowledge.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:swprograms-bounces@hard-core-
> dx.com] On Behalf Of jfiglio1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:01 AM
> To: Shortwave programming discussion
> Subject: Re: [Swprograms] BBC World in USA
>
> So, is it your view that it's this way because that is how we want it???
>
> "Americans have decided that privately-funded, market-driven media is the
model they
> prefer - they have voted with their feet and the ballot box."
>
> With respect, I think that's a big leap.  Most take what's fed to them and
either fail or
> choose not to look beyond their nose.  In that sense, it's their choice.
But the choices on
> offer are limited by others (who shouldn't be) in a position to do so for
very self-interested
> reasons.
>
> But I agree with your comments about self-education and agitation.  I'm a
little less
> hopeful than you that it will make any difference in the end.  But maybe
I'm a bit too
> skeptical.
>
> jaf
>
> ---- Richard Cuff <rdcuff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Unfortunately this is not about to change right away.  Americans have
> > decided that privately-funded, market-driven media is the model they
> > prefer - they have voted with their feet and the ballot box.
> >
> > We have collectively pressured our government to keep marginal tax
> > rates low, which keeps a tradition of commercial funding in place for
> > a variety of institutions that, elsewhere, are government-managed.
> >
> > The good news is that, for many, Big Cable no longer holds the
> > monopoly it did regarding TV distribution.  If the monopoly were
> > absolute, no Time Warner cable systems would carry Fox News or MSNBC
> > because these two services compete for viewers with CNN.  These
> > companies are smart enough to recognize that half a loaf (i.e.
> > carrying competing news services to increase subscriber base, even
> > though your channel has fewer viewers) is better than no loaf (i.e.
> > restricting access to those services).  Many of us can now obtain our
> > television through competing  broadband service providers - e.g.
> > Verizon FIOS.
> >
> > Part of the way to correct this is to increase demand and visibility
> > for the service - i.e. telling our friends and neighbors.  TiVo the
> > program so you can watch it later.  Complain repeatedly to relevant
> > government officials.  Ask them why they don't regulate cable
> > companies more strictly.  Be prepared to pay more in taxes to
> > compensate for the franchise fees ("hush money") these companies pay
> > to local governments.  Vote the unsympathetic officials out of office.
> >
> > Educate ourselves and others regarding the ways one can get access to
> > perspectives such as those on the BBC America newscasts.
> >
> > Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:57 PM, John Figliozzi <jfiglio1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Of course, the behavior of our highly ownership concentrated media is
cause
> > > for great concern.  But since we're in an age when corporate interests
reign
> > > supreme and are allowed to run roughshod over Constitutional rights,
> > > Congress and the FCC seem not inclined to address the situation at
present.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Swprograms mailing list
> > Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
> >
> > To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@hard-core-
> dx.com?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@hard-core-
> dx.com?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.



_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.