[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Alliance Urges FCC to Reconsider Protection Proposals
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Alliance Urges FCC to Reconsider Protection Proposals
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:15:00 -0400
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Xejl8Yb0OirT0jrmmsa40YBEHd4IZrVpiRvrJS1OFvI=; b=IIroDG1EWeXdgXEfeFQMHWkJsWp/C06+VHkQxxG0WZN1ARmWzaKa57PhBHFvNN/67+ helyOGKOIHzulhBvQlrUdvHzLCC3Al9TJK3toNDzMeehKhth6QwoKfuXuXVh/de1YVaF 4JOTINxpWKoeZzlPN3o710m2ng+Fd/ls8+Q9yvlup5jioT7fYICKxnLBD2/7y3J1cVgY QaF4UEm3PhZLtEzfg62i5CYk7AR8/RxbL2XPRP89d4g1ZsBxextYJRDLA1DDW0tEEwDB Jn4emEk2XaWWJ9ul6ttWsEbgKEC9nrcmR3nav8hjNfTFiRJFB5YGYERKX9+xteGGuM1a kwFQ==
Not so fast. The FCC's path over the past several decades has been one of
more, more more signals, ignoring the interference issue. Whether it was
putting the GY's up to 1000 watts at night, the breakdown of the clears,
the proliferation of added night operations, PSA's, PSRA's what have you.
While the only way we will achieve a reduction in the number of AM signals
is by means of economic factors, adding still more signals isn't going to
help anybody. Removing interference protections or greatly reducing them
will by definition increase interference, which decreases coverage and
audience.
That's not revitalization, it's just more of the same old failed ideas.
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NW Phila
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Mark Durenberger <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> WHAT A HOOT! "Fix AM...OH...but don't go QUITE that far in fixing it" <g>
>
> Now that the FCC is considering "revitalizing AM" by adding the sacred
> cows to the mix (the 1-As), the entrenched interests are up in arms.
>
> "Fix things...but Not In My Back Yard."
>
> Old-timers are reminded of the fierce lobbying of the "Clear-Channel
> Broadcasting Service" in the 60's; even the arguments are the same: "Don't
> kill Clear-Channel Broadcasting; we need it for National Defense, weather
> alerts" etc. etc. I doubt there are more than a half-dozen 50-kilowatt
> 1-As who try to service their entire protected-coverage areas.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mark Durenberger
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Gibson
>
>
> http://www.radioworld.com/article/alliance-urges-fcc-to-reconsider-protection-proposals/278493
>
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> Registration info:
> http://www.nrcdxas.org
>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
Registration info:
http://www.nrcdxas.org
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx