[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-5



Gary, I started at 14:30 after an alert from Colin.  By then, I think the
peak had just passed.  Still plenty of purely Asian DX, but quickly died,
with a few brief bursts of life from 594, 747, 774, and 828 and
occasionally 1566.  73,  Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:07 AM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It was an excellent Asian morning on the low band during sunrise
> enhancement today, with several less common TP's coming out of the noise to
> reach fair levels. 603-China and 657-Pyongyang (with a weak TP co-channel)
> were the main attractions early on around 1410, but 639-CNR1 and 738-BEL2
> (presumed) also joined them after 1430. 603-HLSA also came out of the noise
> around 1425 to dominate China for the rest of the session. The combination
> of relatively obscure TP's and competing receiver/ antenna setups (the CC
> Skywave inductively boosted by a 15" FSL, and a "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun
> PL-380 model) made for an exciting morning. The "Science Fiction PL-380"
> once again proved that it is pretty competitive in all-out TP-DXing,
> managing a surprising reception of 603-China at 1410-- hardly routine DX on
> a hand-held portable far from the ocean.
>
> My session started off at 1355 with the Asian propagation already in full
> swing, as both the Japanese big guns on 594, 693, 747 and 828 and the
> Korean regulars on 972 and 1566 set the pace with good signals in and out.
> 1593-CNR1 was also fair to good early on but fizzled quickly. Already the
> low band frequencies of 558, 603, 657 and 738 were managing audio, however,
> and these continued to become more interesting as daylight increased.
> 657-Pyongyang's elderly tirade woman was dominating a TP co-channel
> (Henan?) at 1408, while 603-China reached a fair level at 1410 all by
> itself. Although its signal wasn't exactly overpowering the Chinese female
> speech was clearly audible on the FSL-enhanced PL-380-- a major surprise.
> 639-CNR1 and a presumed 738-BEL2 also built up strength to fair levels
> shortly thereafter but were troubled by domestic splatter on both antenna
> setups.  603-HLSA took over the frequency from a fading China around 1425
> but there was a low-level 603 mix for the duration of the propagation.
> Overall the morning was one of the best in recent memory, and it will be
> interesting to read the other reports.
>
> 603  China  (Hulun Buir?)  Fair Chinese female speech at 1410 (CC Skywave
> and 15" FSL)
> https://app.box.com/s/d3vdtyrk4ne0z4kclpq6a1qv8tmidmlc
> 603  China  (Hulun Buir?)  Same signal on the "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun
> PL-380 handheld model
> https://app.box.com/s/p080s248zelnr6bxzg2eg98qj9onb80h
>
> 603  HLSA  Namyang, S. Korea  Korean vocal music dominating over China at
> 1427 (CC Skywave and 15" FSL)
> https://app.box.com/s/yrl8dwjj45h9j0iesr9nbk1bveydsbc0
> 603  HLSA  Namyang, S. Korea  Same signal on the "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun
> PL-380
> https://app.box.com/s/j48b67b7wffngt7tp5rpatpzj7xpqpaq
>
> 657  Pyongyang BS   Pyongyang, N. Korea   Elderly tirade woman shouting
> above more sedate co-channel (Henan?) at 1408
> https://app.box.com/s/5pdn7nccw5pgtmhc5992p6q04521xlui
>
> 73 and Good DX,
> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> 7.5" loopstick CC Skywave + 15" FSL
> 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx