[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-5
- Subject: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-5
- From: d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1457226432; bh=V6BfgCtkwtXsmpm+ChsVLEAz2tm9KaSL7PHIdlqkWlc=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=DtW09QbmZ/lp52GU8TtljdK+/j1YxIZjrQEbRjPP1wVN7+Jve3N7mKzdzsmmp9cD8 DVhsAz6ZkNWDr93f60Ngvv9Wx0YVOH5uYlvzLaGa8y3wEFvguSLIgVZOHCBYItr2bI Q0v5JNlCk7iJEVj9qq1HU80pCIXNyS+Nii5VxPhJGqN0+oHUXCRSla/0siSK7uObyF badTLuDjrdvnexNW2AY1fmReuVaU1YPTlpB44BU5YSlVwIBCMMAa9CT8H8s7xQDle9 QKatysxhqdkDWWVSoTANuQCWwZfsayPRgXvykqaFn9Q1CwSIZtN9GSqEmi+8ZDR8D8 b7gicFlukXeBg==
- Thread-index: 7d3+agC0hRg/o3Mc6LwrxabcxEQtww==
- Thread-topic: Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-5
It was an excellent Asian morning on the low band during sunrise enhancement today, with several less common TP's coming out of the noise to reach fair levels. 603-China and 657-Pyongyang (with a weak TP co-channel) were the main attractions early on around 1410, but 639-CNR1 and 738-BEL2 (presumed) also joined them after 1430. 603-HLSA alsoÂcame out of the noise around 1425 to dominate China for the rest of the session. The combination of relatively obscure TP's and competing receiver/ antenna setups (the CC Skywave inductively boosted by a 15" FSL, and a "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 model) made for an exciting morning. The "Science Fiction PL-380" once again proved that it is pretty competitive in all-out TP-DXing, managing a surprising reception of 603-China at 1410-- hardly routine DX on a hand-held portable far from the ocean.
Â
My session started off at 1355 with the Asian propagation already in full swing,Âas both the Japanese big guns on 594, 693, 747 and 828 and the Korean regulars on 972 and 1566 set the pace with good signals in and out. 1593-CNR1 was also fair to good early on but fizzled quickly. Already the low band frequencies of 558, 603, 657 and 738 were managing audio, however, and these continued to become more interesting as daylight increased. 657-Pyongyang's elderly tirade woman was dominatingÂa TPÂco-channel (Henan?) at 1408, whileÂ603-China reached a fair level at 1410 all by itself.ÂAlthough its signal wasn't exactly overpowering theÂChinese female speech was clearly audible on the FSL-enhanced PL-380-- a major surprise. 639-CNR1 andÂa presumed 738-BEL2 also built up strength to fair levels shortly thereafter but were troubled by domestic splatter on both antenna setups. 603-HLSA took over the frequency from a fading China around 1425 but there was a low-level 603 mix for the duration of the propagation. Overall the morning was one of the best in recent memory, and it will be interesting to read the other reports.
Â
603ÂÂChina (Hulun Buir?) Fair Chinese female speech at 1410 (CC Skywave and 15" FSL)
https://app.box.com/s/d3vdtyrk4ne0z4kclpq6a1qv8tmidmlc Â
603 China (Hulun Buir?) Same signal on the "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 handheld model
https://app.box.com/s/p080s248zelnr6bxzg2eg98qj9onb80h Â
Â
603 HLSA Namyang, S.ÂKorea Korean vocal music dominating over China at 1427 (CC Skywave and 15" FSL)
https://app.box.com/s/yrl8dwjj45h9j0iesr9nbk1bveydsbc0 Â
603 HLSA Namyang, S. Korea Same signal on the "barefoot" 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380
https://app.box.com/s/j48b67b7wffngt7tp5rpatpzj7xpqpaq Â
Â
657Â Pyongyang BSÂÂ Pyongyang, N. KoreaÂÂ Elderly tirade woman shouting above more sedate co-channel (Henan?) at 1408
https://app.box.com/s/5pdn7nccw5pgtmhc5992p6q04521xlui Â
Â
73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
7.5" loopstick CC Skywave + 15" FSL
3" FSL Tecsun PL-380
Â
Â
Â
ÂÂÂ
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx