[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:46:45 -0500
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ukr4wPC99+rUoHVIM8fz2LWo3KzFhhdobjjhIIcWHSM=; b=QmZK8UkKnnJrcfr2M8RTlpHRGkpbqCblVRcd8R13zo/aA49kS7WLyhjYpofBuK2o2i TSc7FZEjXcJWl3OzGuzmTJPS4R+wmCcEi4zjhamPezVPcwhOKKelE75u0pvPcdWy5yGY LaOpNB27k7urBWXRVzjD5Uy9ZWl2VYHNJNt+uvCWRboj5oAxsSmzoMJNOpXG3IhRxmxK u5sMt7zPaOGaRlTUD0XuY+Ms0XONdSzmCJtYHl54/znd4VZbGaECjDD8KeDeHyhJzV+a QLW0UonFusBB7hpq0xukfxF46NVmSKc4U/CpmR1wA1EKlwgry180BbmZzhVxtuj5bkye qYpA==
Maybe what's interfering with WLW is an adjacent channel's IBOC ?
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NW Phila
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:35 PM, David Faulkner via IRCA <
irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Faulkner <drdsfaulkner@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:32:58 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM
> Hi All:
> While I'm sorry to see the big stations go, they really are dinosaurs. The
> only way I can get a listenable signal out of WLW anymore is to listen in
> the car, and even then they will occasionally be overridden by a descending
> warbling tone that has to be coming from one of the neighbors' routers (if
> it's not coming from mine). If there was something I wanted to listen to on
> WLW I'd probably listen online. I personally don't think AM can be
> revitalized, no matter how many signals they put on it. The costs are
> getting too high to justify the return on investment, particularly when we
> start talking about highly directional stations. How many stations have cut
> their night power so they can be non-directional? My guess is, several
> hundred
>
> 73David
>
>
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:50 PM, Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> Although I think this is a shame. However, this has been going on since
> the 1970s where more and more stations are allowed on clear channel
> frequencies and the long distance reception is getting harder and harder.
> This is no surprise. The FCC is changing the whole spectrum. They are
> repacking the TV dial and selling frequencies to the cel phone industry, so
> TV markets will be forced to cram more channels into a smaller area. It
> used to be back in the 60s, a person could easily listen to stations coast
> to coast with a clock radio. Today, hearing a station a 1000 miles away
> takes some effort. But we do have streaming in today's World and I use that
> a lot with my wifi radio.
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Martin
> Seaside OR
> KGED QSL Manager
>
> > From: wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:03:39 -0800
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM
> >
> > http://wvxu.org/post/unhappy-birthday-wlw-am
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx