Re: [IRCA] 909 1215 etc

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Agree with Don that on LW, the DKAZ is a poor performer.  In Masset, it's
only Iceland that's a reasonable target in the evening.  My mini-Beverage
(about 450') is far better.  Both pointed due north.  73,...Walt

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As we all know it's good to have antenna choices.  There haven't been too
> many audible TA days to test it but the DKaz will sometimes produce better
> results when the regular beverage antennas don't so its arrival angle must
> be the one that is favoured on those days.  I don't have a good handle on
> what is happening but it certainly is a useful choice to have.  It also
> gets used on much higher mid HF frequencies and can sometimes produce
> significantly better signals than any of my other choices for these
> frequencies , mainly the Wellbrook ALA100 and some large HF log periodics.
>   The pattern seems to be reversed up that high in frequency, which seems
> reasonable that it would be. It is not a good performer on longwave.  Altho
> I did get the posts in and the trenching etc all done last fall, I did not
> complete the project which consists of 4 separate DKAZ antennas pointed
> essentially NE SE SW and NW.   That should be done this summer.  This area
> used to have a HiZ 8 vertical array which proved to be less useful than I
> had hoped.
>
> 73 Don
> VE6JY
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Company Logo]
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Nice to see that you built a DKAZ. Interesting that it was doing better
> > than the Bevs. What is it like for TA's when they're audible?
> >
> > Are you pleased in general with the DKAZ?   73 KAZ
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > at 0600  1089 and 1215 have significant carriers... but only on the NE
> > > DKaz... almost undiscernable on either 2100 Eu beverage or the
> Wellbrook
> > > loop.
> > >
> > > 73 Don
> > > VE6JY
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [image: Company Logo]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Nigel Pimblett <nige2730@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Very feeble here.  855, 882 and 909 are the only ones readily
> > > discernable.
> > > >
> > > > 73,
> > > >
> > > > NIgel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29/02/2016 10:30 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Some TA carriers this evening..
> > > >>
> > > >> 909 is the strongest so far, but have had 1215, 855, 1089 and 1107
> all
> > > >> showing signs of life.
> > > >>
> > > >> best wishes,
> > > >>
> > > >> Nick
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> IRCA mailing list
> > > >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >>
> > > >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> > the
> > > >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >>
> > > >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >>
> > > >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx