[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 909 1215 etc
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 909 1215 etc
- From: Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:26:02 -0600
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=vM9fp0CjowJLjYgnJctPKGI5azX/Iy5cT/cUUu98Cbo=; b=ffLCFJT8KTvHUvRDqyte+Hqb/QwUEdt2j1yLGeYNCeHVRYm7Lh4HWEZxuBu2L4eqjU K617nxPn68evuoe86+P1VncLvBvGyNQm3RJkn71a1GlxZUElEWghQe07AdsKiJ4/5WZL 6r+HAn+aXoswVHkEU9cfEMp7Lpq1lTx+5U/FXw/Dm06JVFHGzZjwgvS1VqpINYdKs26a Z9HnCHxlDqygwYBAVg/tgk1X3rGKvdL5VOAQsjhNU8JDPFmh9c7a4xhqriZMoi/i3vsX ZarRw31XVtUll5LJGmZMZjHY2kz/RUQV1f7vT1Mu9hLti8UhMECuvcOyPMi7EPkE5nDc WOzg==
Nice to see that you built a DKAZ. Interesting that it was doing better
than the Bevs. What is it like for TA's when they're audible?
Are you pleased in general with the DKAZ? 73 KAZ
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> at 0600 1089 and 1215 have significant carriers... but only on the NE
> DKaz... almost undiscernable on either 2100 Eu beverage or the Wellbrook
> loop.
>
> 73 Don
> VE6JY
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Company Logo]
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Nigel Pimblett <nige2730@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Very feeble here. 855, 882 and 909 are the only ones readily
> discernable.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > NIgel
> >
> >
> > On 29/02/2016 10:30 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> >
> >> Some TA carriers this evening..
> >>
> >> 909 is the strongest so far, but have had 1215, 855, 1089 and 1107 all
> >> showing signs of life.
> >>
> >> best wishes,
> >>
> >> Nick
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx