[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 909 1215 etc
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 909 1215 etc
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:31:42 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kyd7f0Tnm3rF3nWpWEZRAKyrOIY80YgIm98fOTABof4=; b=Bk/aDiXd2UUeSihVAU38ve3OULHOg84nWH8ZpcgL5/yvdvYJT00Ex4x7iNCmy8Ed1V viTxswK8Jen0lNiBsjJwl4JiQXMX/zSro3bibGiJLxGfIVbhAlBDZFjKUx92yO33ZiWd lSZF9mgHxDfBTxahxyaDF69qktD3Fnqk4fFM6VfgEhaa64EvJuL5/2sZGz67gPeKNu7e nPkSxC6bo8JcmQw8X/UOZ2uECSeIckgzkcHtIo7toFNfudvN2yX6t+L8cyCaro1om9ds iKyc0NnKJRcvaxaOkfmWoIEQaJGrATuBOBZ6lGISvK/kKPwVad3HdpV9GkeaLCuX7xPA t0iQ==
Neil, I built a DKAZ for my DX cottage on Haida Gwaii. I used it with
great success in October. It's aimed for Europe, so I'm looking forward to
using it again when I'm next there later in the month. I swing it around
for South Pacific reception. It does well. It's hard to do an exact A/B
comparison to the BOG which has been my stalwart DX antenna as it's aimed
more to the NW. In any case, it's a very favourable antenna as long as
it's fed to the FLG 100. I tried it last summer with just a matching
transformer, and results were quite disappointing. It was quite deaf
compared to the BOG. 73,...Walt
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nice to see that you built a DKAZ. Interesting that it was doing better
> than the Bevs. What is it like for TA's when they're audible?
>
> Are you pleased in general with the DKAZ? 73 KAZ
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > at 0600 1089 and 1215 have significant carriers... but only on the NE
> > DKaz... almost undiscernable on either 2100 Eu beverage or the Wellbrook
> > loop.
> >
> > 73 Don
> > VE6JY
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: Company Logo]
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Nigel Pimblett <nige2730@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Very feeble here. 855, 882 and 909 are the only ones readily
> > discernable.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > NIgel
> > >
> > >
> > > On 29/02/2016 10:30 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> > >
> > >> Some TA carriers this evening..
> > >>
> > >> 909 is the strongest so far, but have had 1215, 855, 1089 and 1107 all
> > >> showing signs of life.
> > >>
> > >> best wishes,
> > >>
> > >> Nick
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> IRCA mailing list
> > >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >>
> > >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >>
> > >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >>
> > >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx