Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can confirm it is NOT WKAX Russellvile, AL. I spoke to their engineer
today... So without going back to see if that's directly in the path and in
consideration, we can rule it out.

Paul

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016, Robert LaFore <rdlafore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For mine (320 from Acworth GA) Magnetic----
>
> On 2/9/2016 10:41 PM, Chuck Hutton wrote:
>
>> That is always true for loop antennas. There's no reason to even mention
>> the maximum. The null is sharp (narrow) and deep and there fore easily
>> detected. The peak is extremely broad and you won't see a difference if you
>> are off by 20, 30 or more degrees.
>>
>> Now if I only knew if people were using magnetic or true north......
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Kevin Redding <
>> dc2daylight@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:26 AM
>> To: Glenn Hauser; Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station
>>
>> As I was taught in the Navy....
>>
>> You find the signal. Then you rotate the antenna for minimum signal. That
>> is the direction the sending station is located.
>>
>> Kevin
>> Crump, TN
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Glenn Hauser via IRCA wrote:
>>
>> This is getting more and more confusing. Tom, do you mean then that the
>>> maximum signal would be 90 degrees away from 170, i.e., 80 / 260 degrees,
>>> or do you mean that 170 degrees is the direxion of the maximum, not minimum
>>> signal?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx