Re: [IRCA] âRe: Wellbrook Large Aperture Loop Antenna ALA100LN

[Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Iâve owned the DX Engineering phaser and the Quantum Phaser. No contest between the two. The Quantum is easier to use, achives deeper nulls faster, and costs a fraction of the DX Engineering model. 

While I didnât own an SDR at the time, I donât recall the DX Engineering model being more broadbanded than the Quantum. 

Strangely, Iâm a huge fan of DX Engineering products, and have a shack full of their stuffâbut in this instance, the Quantum is the better product by far. 

73,

Les Rayburn, N1LF


Les Rayburn, director
High Noon Media Services
130 1st Avenue West
Alabaster, AL 35007-8536
205-621-7500
205-621-7505 FAX
205-253-4867 CELL
highnoonfilm.com

[This message and any attached documents contain information from the sender that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you.]




> On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:32 AM, Guy Atkins <dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> No, I haven't used the DX Engineering phaser. I lumped it in with others in
> my comment based on Dave Aichelman's experience. He owned the DX
> Engineering phaser and found it cumbersome to use and operate compared to
> the Quantum. He sold the DX Engineering unit and kept the Quantum phaser.
> 
> I don't recall him saying it was any more broad banded than the Quantum,
> but perhaps its the equal of the Wellbrook phaser in this regard.
> 
> 73, Guy
> 
> 
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
>> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc:
>> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 02:08:35 +0000
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] âRe: Wellbrook Large Aperture Loop Antenna ALA100LN
>> 
>> Guy:
>> 
>> Did you test this with the DX Engineering phaser? It requires no tweaking
>> of the phasing and I thought it would work at least as well or better than
>> Wellbrook.  â
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx