Re: [IRCA] TP 26 Oct Victoria version

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nick, interesting that my strongest logging was 1575 VOA Thailand around
14:00 UTC, and yours, not.  73,...Walt

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, signals were there as early as 1300UT, but not that spectacular here,
> and quite erratic.   And just the usual suspects: 738 747 774 828 972 1053
> 1287 1566 over and over.
>
> After 1400UT, a touch more variety, and 972 1287 and 1566 did stay in
> until 1500UT and later.
>
>
>
> pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at
> least briefly):
>
> nope
>
>
>
> Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it understandable
> by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>
> 774 JOUB 1325UT, didn't note program...
> 1566 HLAZ man in Chinese 1426UT
>
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise
> could be understood by a native speaker:
>
> 972 HLCA? female vocal 1415UT
> 1053 jammer came to its usual halt at 1402UT, but hardly there really
> 1287 JOHR man in Japanese 1419UT
>
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at
> by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music)
>
> 981 man talking in surprisingly benign CKNW-980 splash 1410UT, sounded
> Chinese, didn't snag a CNR1 parallel in time
> 1053 jammer came to its usual halt at 1402UT, but hardly there really;
> didn't note down when 747 and 828 made similarly quiet appearances
> 1575 jingle of some sort, SE Asian? talk 1413UT
>
>
>
> Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or
> ravaged by splatter)
>
>  1017 1098 1134 1188
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx