[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] KFI 640 kHz heard at 11:23 AM PST Daytime DX



Thanks Dennis! Spent alot of time looking at your pictures. Really
appreciate the time you took to take those pictures if KFI.
It's amazing to me how 75' can make such a huge difference.
Does their newest transmitter also play  a part in their decrease in
coverage?

Sincerely,
Todd Skaine
Woodbury, MN
Sony ICF 2010
Superradio 2
Grundig S350 &M400
Toyota car radio
On Feb 27, 2015 6:36 PM, "Dennis Gibson" <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here's a photo I took of the new KFI tower in 2010. It's 675 feet high
> with a massive top hat.
>
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dcgibson55/4507092608/in/set-72157623814821388
>
> The old tower was 750 feet. The city of La Mirada wouldn't give Clear
> Channel a permit for 750 feet. The groundwave a bit over 100 miles away is
> close but not quite what it used to be. On groundwave driving north 250
> plus miles away KNX goes away while KFI is still somewhat audible. If KNX
> went further north KSCO wouldn't be allowed to have the massive 10 kW
> nondirectional daytime signal it does in that area.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 27, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > KFI does not have the "punch" they used to have up here in the NW. They
> used to be the strongest signal from So Cal, but KNX is stronger at night
> these days.
> >
> > Patrick Martin
> > Seaside OR
> > KGED QSL Manager
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:17:15 -0600
> >> From: todftscytj7707@xxxxxxxxx
> >> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KFI 640 kHz heard at 11:23 AM PST Daytime DX
> >>
> >> I'm willing to bet that the shorter tower affected skywave as well
> although
> >> the same conditions and clutter from today will never be duplicated with
> >> conditions and openness from the late 70's to early 80's.They used to
> be a
> >> powerhouse going into eastern Iowa. Here in Minnesota I have 630 contend
> >> with, so I've only heard KFI a handful of times and only once with their
> >> new tower in place.
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Todd Skaine
> >> Woodbury, MN
> >> Sony ICF 2010
> >> Superradio 2
> >> Grundig S350 &M400
> >> Toyota car radio
> >>> On Feb 27, 2015 3:01 PM, "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dennis,
> >>>
> >>> Good going. Since KFI installed the new shorter tower some years back,
> >>> they have not gotten out as well during the day. I used to hear at
> least
> >>> their carrier even most days in the Summer, but not since the new
> tower was
> >>> installed. It is nice to see a mid day reception of KFI.
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> Patrick Martin
> >>> Seaside OR
> >>> KGED QSL Manager
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:39:17 +0000
> >>>> From: vroomski@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject: [IRCA] KFI 640 kHz heard at 11:23 AM PST Daytime DX
> >>>>
> >>>> Surprised this morning to hear KFI 640 at 11:23 AM PST with a fair
> >>> signal at a distance of 850 miles. Best reception on the W-E K9
> Loop.KFI is
> >>> peaking at S-3 with the Palstar MW550P tuner peaked.
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Dennis Vroom,
> >>>> Kalama, WAJRC NRD 545
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> IRCA mailing list
> >>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>>>
> >>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>>>
> >>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>>>
> >>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> IRCA mailing list
> >>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>>
> >>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>>
> >>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>>
> >>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx