Re: [IRCA] 8 p.m. EDT / 0000 UTC: not that auroral yet

[neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

11 pm CDT report. Things seem a tad less AU. CKST 1040 is backgrounding WHO with Canadian sports reports but 1130 isn't in. 950 oldies from Denver is still about the clearest I've ever heard them and there's no trace of CFAM which I think the slight AU has killed.

73 and to bed.. KAZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sep 12, 2014 10:49 PM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: "abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] 8 p.m. EDT / 0000 UTC: not that auroral yet
>
>Slighty AU here at 9 and 10 PM CDT. Central and Western Canada stuff weak but 950 Crusin' from Denver is near entertainment level. 910 Denver in weakly and no trace of KSJB Minot. 1040 CO left day power on a couple hours late (as is common) and was bothering WHO. XET o/u CBW at 10 pm. KVTT TX with ethnic stuff and Pakistan ment and ID thru KFAB 1110.
>
>73 KAZ Barrington IL Perseus and Broadside DKAZ Array aimed West.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rick Dau <drummer1965us@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Sep 12, 2014 8:45 PM
>>To: "irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Cc: "abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: [IRCA] 8 p.m. EDT / 0000 UTC: not that auroral yet
>>
>>Nor it is here.  The K index at Boulder is 6, yet I'm getting Grand Forks, North Dakota on 1310 and 1370 and Sioux Falls on 1270.  Just wondering where the good auroral DX has disappeared off to...  73,Rick Dau (heading to Billings for the convention next week)South Omaha, Nebraska
>>
>>
>>--Forwarded Message Attachment--
>>To: CapeDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; badx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; am@xxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: 8 p.m. EDT / 0000 UTC: not that auroral yet
>>From: markwa1ion@xxxxxxx
>>Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:35:10 -0400
>>
>>As of 8 p.m. local Friday, I'm still hearing Lakes area stations such 
>>as CJBC 860 Toronto, so I would say it's not that auroral yet.  Reloj 
>>de Cuba is in there but pretty far behind.
>> 
>>Auroral would be some combination of Brazil, Cuba, St. Kitts, and 
>>assorted other stations from the south on 860.
>> 
>>Some TA's are in.  891 and 981 Algerians are packing the most punch.
>> 
>>I'll check again in a couple of hours.
>> 
>>Marc DeLorenzo and I had a lunch get-together today at Seafood Sam's 
>>here in South Yarmouth.  Among other subjects we were talking about 
>>classic auroras of the past when Latin American and Florida stations 
>>came in on regional and "graveyard" frequencies in the 1230-1490 kHz 
>>range.  It's been a long time since I "surfed" an opening like that.  
>>We're talking about back in the era of one-frequency-at-a-time DXing, 
>>no Perseus or Excalibur SDR's to scoop up the whole band at top-of-hour 
>>ID time for later replay. One can only hope that this current 
>>much-ballyhooed solar occurrence gives us some crazy DX like some of us 
>>remember from the '60s, '70s, and '80s.  Upside is now many of us have 
>>spectrum-capturing receivers.  Downside is that all the Latin American 
>>"splits" (non-10-kHz-multiples) are gone.
>> 
>>Mark Connelly, WA1ION
>>South Yarmouth, MA
>> 		 	   		  
>>_______________________________________________
>>IRCA mailing list
>>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx