Re: [IRCA] Another WWXL 1450 DX test
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Another WWXL 1450 DX test



The lowest frequency was always chosen to be 1.6 or 2 MHZ in the past, as the plethora of interference from AM stations makes it difficult to dig out the needle of returned signal in the haystack of babble. I have seen occasional sets of data going lower (1 MHZ) but cant remember if it was daytime or not.
 
Chuck
 
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 21:09:02 -0400
> From: bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Another WWXL 1450 DX test
> 
> On 03/16/2014 02:50 PM, Walter Salmaniw wrote:
> > It's easy to hear sweeps.  I often wonder whether they are ionosones.  We
> > sure see them frequently on the Perseus waterfall on SW.
> 
> An interesting thought, Walt.  I believe swept-frequency ionosondes (aka 
> chirpsounders) typically don't go below 2 MHz, but no doubt there are 
> exceptions.  If you did hear one zip through an AM broadcast channel 
> (and I think I've heard a few myself), it would be a single, isolated 
> sweep, and it wouldn't be repeated for at least 15 minutes or so.  In 
> contrast, if sweeps are used as part of a DX test, they should be 
> repeated quite rapidly, and the difference should be quite obvious to 
> the ear.
> 
> Barry
> 
> -- 
> Barry McLarnon  Ottawa, ON
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx