[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Fw: Re: Elad FDM-S1 and FDM-S2
- Subject: [IRCA] Fw: Re: Elad FDM-S1 and FDM-S2
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 09:49:19 -0800 (PST)
Below is a capsule review of a beta tester who is on the WTFDA lists. While his review is
FM-oriented, some of the points are more general. Another tester, who is on this list will
try to pull something more together in a day or two.
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NNW of Philadelphia
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
--- On Mon, 3/3/14, Bill Nollman <billct97@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bill Nollman <billct97@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [lbi-dx] Fw: Re: [IRCA] Elad FDM-S1 and FDM-S2
> To: lbi-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, March 3, 2014, 9:08 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I’m not. But I can
> say that for FM DXing it is 99.9999% as good as my modified
> Yamaha T85 in a very high RF area when pointed right at the
> locals. I tested aimed at both antenna farms in Hartford,
> one at 4 miles and the other at 9 miles. It performed
> exactly the same as the T85 with images being the same but
> no overloading at all. Sensitivity was a hair less on some
> but not all weak stations. Selectivity just as good.
> Soundwise I think the T85 has a bit more bass but that is
> probably because it was designed to be a component in a high
> end audio system so maybe they have punched it up a bit.
> That said the fact they oversample doesn’t seem to matter
> much. It is that good. Keith has done more than I with MW
> but a quick check it does seem to be just as good as the
> Perseus. Keith thinks slightly better with its audio. You
> can use the ELAD GUI (which has some interesting bells and
> whistles), SDR-Console (free) or Studio 1 (one supports 1
> Virtual RX currently). For the price I don’t think you can
> go wrong as it covers 0-150MHz. One thing we haven’t fully
> tested is it’s ability to record 6MHz without skipping.
> That’s is being determined this week. Oh, last
> thing…while there is a bit of a language challenge Franco
> and the ELAD team has been VERY responsive so far. Fixes
> have happened in days, sometimes hours! Bill Nollman
>
> --- On Sun, 3/2/14, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Elad FDM-S1 and FDM-S2
> > To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club
> of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sunday, March 2, 2014, 8:03 PM
> > They certainly look ideal for travel
> > Mark. Principal question is how much the
> lack
> > of preselection filters affects them (they call it a
> > "sampler" at first, changing to
> "receiver" for under 30Mhz
> > for which there is a low pass filter.) The
> similarly
> > priced SDR-IQ does have switched front end filters,
> but
> > it delivers 192kHz bandwidth compared to up to
> > 6144kHz (really, that's what they say;
> the Elad
> > started as a 192kHz receiver also)
> >
> > A couple of us here on the west coast are talking
> > about making an investment to find out...there is
> a
> > reasonably good review or two floating around on the
> web.
> >
> > The S2 is very intriguing, though not yet widely
> available;
> > 2 different receivers possible (though only at about
> 300kHz
> > bandwidth each, I understand, though you can still get
> 6MHz
> > bandwidth out of one; there's also the complication
> of a
> > separate VHF receiver)...per Simon Brown on the
> sdr-radio
> > list:
> >
> > "Preliminary: FDM-S2 has a 122.88MHz sampling rate
> with
> > 16bit ADC High performance analog to digital converter
> this
> > means: 9kHz to 52MHz direct sampling SDR receiver;
> -132dBm
> > MDS (Bandwidth 500Hz) @ 14 MHz – USB Port Powered –
> 2
> > antennas input: one for HF one for VHF (VHF input has
> 2
> > filters: one for use Broadcasting FM Band (74-108MHz),
> one
> > for 136-160 MHz, and more. - possibility two
> independent
> > receivers: FDM-S2 has two independent NCO (Numerical
> Local
> > Oscillator) and the new FDM-SW2 software, using
> Multichannel
> > Extio Dll."
> >
> > Stay tuned.....to a 6MHz wide swath.
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 23:13 02-03-14, you wrote:
> > > Elad FDM-S1 and FDM-S2
> > >
> > > http://shop.elad-usa.com/sdr-radio/fdm-s1/
> > > http://shop.elad-usa.com/sdr-radio/fdm-s2/
> > >
> > > I thought I saw a mention of these recently.
> > >
> > > Are these viable competitors to Perseus and
> Excalibur
> > in raw DXing capability terms and in spectrum capture
> /
> > replay ability?
> > >
> > > Of use for "field" operation:
> > > "FDM-S1 is powered by USB connection due to
> less than
> > 2.2 W power consumption."
> > >
> > > Mark Connelly, WA1ION
> > > South Yarmouth, MA
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
> list are
> > those of the original contributors and do not
> necessarily
> > reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors,
> publishing
> > staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
> are
> > those of the original contributors and do not
> necessarily
> > reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors,
> publishing
> > staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Reply
> via web post
>
>
>
> Reply to sender
>
>
>
> Reply to group
>
>
> Start a New
> Topic
>
>
> Messages in this
> topic
> (2)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Visit Your Group
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx