[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014
- From: d1028gary@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:56:05 -0500 (EST)
Hi Dennis,
<<< Conditions were poor this morning. >>>
A very accurate description. The only stable TP audio here was from a poor 972-HLCA at 1420, and a fair-to-good 1566-HLAZ around 1430. 1593-CNR1 had threshold audio in and out of the 1590-Seattle splatter around 1435. There was no sunrise enhancement here at all on either the high or low band. A very forgettable morning, and quite a drop off from yesterday!
73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Vroom <vroomski@xxxxxxxxx>
To: irca <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 7:31 am
Subject: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014
Listened from 1421-1530 utc. Conditions were poor this morning. Only two
stations with audio. Lower channels were dead. Lowest decent het was 972. HLAZ
1566 at 1528 is still good with music and a S-9 signal.
1566 REPUBLIC OF KOREA, Cheju, HLAZ FEBC 1421 good signal with woman in
Chinese. NW ewe. Good at 1517 NW bog. 02/03/2014
1593 CHINA, Changzhou CNR1 1422 fair signal with man in Chinese. Moderate KOHI
splatter. NW ewe 02/03/2014
Best regards,
Dennis,
Kalama, WA
JRC NRD 545 + Drake R8B
NW ewe + 428' bog NW
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx