Re: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014



Hi Dennis,

<<<  Conditions were poor this morning.   >>>

A very accurate description. The only stable TP audio here was from a poor 972-HLCA at 1420, and a fair-to-good 1566-HLAZ around 1430. 1593-CNR1 had threshold audio in and out of the 1590-Seattle splatter around 1435. There was no sunrise enhancement here at all on either the high or low band. A very forgettable morning, and quite a drop off from yesterday!

73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna

   




-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Vroom <vroomski@xxxxxxxxx>
To: irca <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 7:31 am
Subject: [IRCA] TP's for Monday, February 03, 2014


Listened from 1421-1530 utc. Conditions were poor this morning. Only two 
stations with audio. Lower channels were dead. Lowest decent het was 972. HLAZ 
1566 at 1528 is still good with music and a S-9 signal. 
1566   REPUBLIC OF KOREA, Cheju, HLAZ FEBC 1421  good signal with woman in 
Chinese. NW ewe.  Good at 1517 NW bog.  02/03/2014
1593   CHINA, Changzhou CNR1 1422 fair signal with man in Chinese. Moderate KOHI 
splatter. NW ewe 02/03/2014

Best regards,
Dennis,
Kalama, WA
JRC NRD 545 + Drake R8B
NW ewe + 428' bog NW
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx