Re: [IRCA] Short antenna radials
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Short antenna radials



Did you mean that KSTP night facilities?  I'm just trying to understand
because I'm just an amateur. If it is their day facilities is it because
that tower is taller than most?
Confused,
Todd in Woodbury Mn
Sony ICF 2010, Toyota car radio
On Dec 1, 2013 8:37 AM, "Mark Durenberger" <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> To add to Dennis' info:  The KSTP antenna was/is a 179.4/179.4 and appears
> to be considered a "Sectional" rather than a Franklin by the FCC.
> Nit-picking' I guess.
>
> Happy Holidays!
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Durenberger
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Gibson
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 10:26 PM
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Short antenna radials
>
> KFI's original tower was there before the industrial complex was built.
> The new tower was built at the same place as the old and uses the same
> ground radials.
>
> KFBK and the KSTP day site both use Franklin antennas, the only two in the
> country. A Franklin antenna consists of two 180 degree electrical height
> (one half wavelength) antennas separated by an insulator, stacked
> vertically and fed at the center. The top half radiates and the bottom half
> is the ground. There are no ground radials.
>
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:50:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: Stephen Airy <pianoplayer88key@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: w7swl@xxxxxxxxx, irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Short antenna radials
>
> I've been recently wondering about this myself (short-radial efficiency,
> or lack thereof), but more from the standpoint of low-power part 15
> transmitting setups.  One example I'm thinking of is such that the total
> length of the antenna AND all ground radials is 3 meters, and does it make
> much difference if you use a base-fed radiator with radials vs a center-fed
> segmented short dipole without radials. (The rule in 15.219 specifies the
> antenna, transmission line, and ground lead cannot exceed 3 meters.)
> There's other scenarios I'm wondering about, but I'll leave them off as I
> think it's beyond the scope of this list.
>
> As for KFI, I believe the original tower was there long before the
> industrial complex was built. So, I think there could be ground radials
> there already, and the new tower was hooked up to them?  Or maybe they have
> another way of grounding it. KFI *is* a few dB weaker at my house than KNX,
> in spite of being 12 miles closer (99 vs 111).  I think it's primarily the
> partial saltwater path for KNX in my case, though.  At a friend's house in
> Moreno Valley, as well as at my grandma's house in San Gabriel, KFI is
> considerably stronger, like 10-15 dB.
>
> There is a very efficient station that I believe doesn't have ground
> radials - 1530 KFBK in Sacramento, CA.  Also I suspect 1500 KSTP St Paul,
> MN's daytime site may also not have ground radials, but I'm not totally
> positive on that one.
>
> 73, Stephen
>
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx