[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-20



Thanks Bruce,

Now I feel a little better about my assessment that this morning's TP-DX was about the same strength as yesterday's :-)

Sorry about the break in your beverage wire, but you guys probably recorded enough Chinese DX during yesterday's superb conditions to keep you busy for a while. We will be looking forward to your report.

Gary 
   


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Oct 20, 2013 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-20


Well, after I sent this message we figured out why conditions weren't 
all that great.  There was a break in the wire, which was probably 
caused by a deer or some other animal.  As a result, we had a 200 foot 
BOG, as opposed to yesterday's 1200 footer.  Oh well, at least we had 
one good morning's DX.

Bruce

On 10/20/2013 09:58, Bruce Portzer wrote:
> Sorry to say today wasn't nearly as good today as yesterday in 
> Grayland.  Conditions seemed promising at about 1200 but never 
> improved after that.
>
> Pyongyang 657 was much better today, but practically everything else 
> was weaker.  The stations were there on almost every channel with 
> somewhat OK signals, but most of them didn't have enough strength to 
> overpower the domestic splatter.  Like yesterday, most of them stayed 
> around until after 1600 UTC.  A few of the usual powerhouses like 774 
> and 1566 had downright impressive signals at times, but made up for it 
> at other times.
>
> Overall, today was below average by Grayland standards
>
> Bruce
>
>
> On 10/20/2013 09:19, d1028gary@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>   It was another interesting morning for signals from the Asian 
>> mainland, with overall results very similar to yesterday's. The big 
>> gun TP's were very vibrant again, with 594, 693, 747, 774, 828, 972, 
>> 1053, 1566 and 1575 all strong at times (774-JOUB and 972-HLCA 
>> especially so).  A generous sunrise enhancement lasted until about 
>> 1500 here, during which plenty of weak Chinese domestic and CRI 
>> stations came out of the woodwork (although none of them were 
>> especially energetic).
>>
>>   Early on (at 1320) 1323-CRI managed its best audio ever here, and 
>> 648-VOR and 657-Pyongyang were both acting like big guns throughout 
>> the session, hitting their peaks around 1350. VOR was breaking 
>> through CISL splatter with its Chinese service while Pyongyang 
>> pounded in with orchestral music during the extended sunrise 
>> enhancement, although nearby 639-CNR1 had the typical anemic Chinese 
>> signal this morning. 639, 918, 927, 936, 963, 981, 1017, 1035, 1044, 
>> 1323 and 1593 all had poor to fair Chinese audio at times during the 
>> extended sunrise enhancement, although none of them sounded very 
>> vibrant. 558-HLQH, 603-HLSA and 738-BEL2 were also around at fair 
>> levels in and out all morning, but never very strong. Best signal of 
>> the morning was again from 972-HLCA, pounding in as usual with Korean 
>> YL conversation around 1410. Overall it was another interesting 
>> session for the Asian mainland, although probably far more 
>> interesting at Grayland.

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx