Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-14

[d1028gary@xxxxxxx]

Nick,

<<<   presumably heard from your beach house at Neah Bay Gary (hi)?  Those 
are some mighty fine signal levels.   >>>

Thanks for your generous comments!

Nowhere near Neah Bay this morning, but maybe the new FSL antenna brought back a little salt water aroma from the Oregon cliffs??

73, Gary



   


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Sep 14, 2013 4:13 pm
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 9-14


presumably heard from your beach house at Neah Bay Gary (hi)?  Those 
are some mighty fine signal levels.

best wishes,

Nick


At 21:00 14-09-13, you wrote:






>Hello All,
>
>Korean and Chinese stations came back in force on the low band here 
>this morning, with vibrant mixes on both 603 and 657. Yesterday's 
>topic of conversation (with Nick) 603-HLSA was in a snarl with China 
>(Hulun Buir?) at the start of the session at 1245, and steadily 
>built up strength until its pop music at 1255 briefly pegged the 
>PL-380's S/N display at the 25 maximum (the first time that it's 
>ever managed this in Puyallup over 7 years). 603-China was 
>persistent, though, and it made the frequency pretty wild all 
>session long. 657-Pyongyang was also in a mix with China (Henan?) 
>for much of the session, making its tirades sound pretty throttled 
>at times. 639-CNR1 had the frequency all to itself for a huge signal 
>at 1318 (the best heard here in 2 years), and 558-HLQH had no 
>trouble keeping up a nice parallel with the monster-signal 603-HLSA.
>
>The usual TP big guns were vibrant on 594, 693, 747, 774, 828, 972, 
>1053, 1134, 1287, 1566 and 1575 this morning, with 594-JOAK and 
>972-HLCA especially strong.  The session was one of the best in 
>recent memory for the low-band Koreans and Chinese, making the 
>morning sound like something worthy of mid-October.
>
>603  HLSA  Namyang, S. Korea  Very strong with pop music over China
>             at 1255; this recording pegged the PL-380's S/N at the 
> strongest point
> 
>http://www.mediafire.com/listen/722p4pqw71fic19/603-HLSA-1255z091413Pl380.MP3
>
>603  China  (Hulun Buir?)  Temporarily dominant over HLSA at 1254, but the
>             Korean station's pop music eventually dominates 
> strongly at the end of the MP3
> 
>http://www.mediafire.com/listen/pk4xkzxojefjxji/603-China-HLSA-mix-1254z091413PL380.MP3 

>
>
>639  CNR1  China Synchros  Very strong with Chinese YL speech at 1318; best
>             signal here since 2011
> 
>http://www.mediafire.com/listen/g4j25jse25awm2a/639-CNR1-1318z091413PL380.MP3
>
>657  Pyongyang  N. Korea  Temporarily dominant over Chinese 
>co-channel (Henan?)
>             at 1313 with usual lame tirades
> 
>http://www.mediafire.com/listen/3az5598wfhuytqa/657-Pyongyang-1313z091413PL380.MP3
>
>73 and Good DX,
>Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>7.5" loopstick Tecsun PL-380 Ultralight +
>12" medium wave FSL antenna
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx